• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[儿科重症监护病房259例死亡的方式及原因]

[Modality and causes of 259 deaths in a pediatric intensive care unit].

作者信息

Martinot A, Lejeune C, Hue V, Fourier C, Beyaert C, Diependaele J F, Deschildre A, Leclerc F

机构信息

Service de réanimation infantile, hôpital Calmette, Lille, France.

出版信息

Arch Pediatr. 1995 Aug;2(8):735-41. doi: 10.1016/0929-693x(96)81242-5.

DOI:10.1016/0929-693x(96)81242-5
PMID:7550837
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are few data available from European pediatric intensive care units (PICU) regarding the modes of death and their causes.

POPULATION AND METHODS

Two hundred and fifty nine children, not including neonates, died in the PICU over a 7-year period (1987-1993). Data were obtained from a computerized data base and the retrospective review of medical records by two intensivists. Deaths were classified into three groups according to the terminal event: brain death (BD), unsuccessful resuscitation (UR), do-not-resuscitate order and limitation and/or withdrawal of therapy (LWT).

RESULTS

BD was the most common mode of death (38%); UR accounted for 34% and LWT for 28% of deaths. There was no significant annual variation in the proportion of BD, UR and LWT. Age and sex were similar in the three groups. The predominant organ system failure involved upon admission was the central nervous system (52%) in the LWT group, and the cardiovascular system (54%) in the UR group. Severe chronic disease (37%) and immunosuppression (19%) were more prevalent in the LWT group than in the BD group. Time from admission to death was longer in the LWT group (median = 119 hours) as compared to the UR group (10 hours) and the BD group (54 hours). Ten percent of the BD patients became organ transplant donors. Sixty-seven per cent of BD patients had medical contraindication for organ donation: parents did not accept organ donation in 61% of potential cases. Thirty deaths (12%) seemed to be avoidable; dehydration from acute infectious gastroenteritis (n = 7) was the most common cause of avoidable death.

CONCLUSIONS

The modes of death in our PICU were statistically not different from those seen in two of four North-American PICUs; LWT was less prevalent than in the two other PICUs, but the patient populations were very different (presence of neonates and many cardiovascular surgery patients). Assessment of the severity of illness at admission and of functional outcome in the survivors are mandatory in future studies.

摘要

背景

欧洲儿科重症监护病房(PICU)关于死亡方式及其原因的数据很少。

研究对象与方法

在7年期间(1987 - 1993年),259名儿童(不包括新生儿)在PICU死亡。数据来自计算机数据库,并由两名重症监护医生对病历进行回顾性审查。根据终末事件,死亡分为三组:脑死亡(BD)、复苏失败(UR)、不进行心肺复苏医嘱以及限制和/或停止治疗(LWT)。

结果

脑死亡是最常见的死亡方式(38%);复苏失败占死亡病例的34%,限制和/或停止治疗占28%。脑死亡、复苏失败和限制和/或停止治疗的比例没有显著的年度变化。三组的年龄和性别相似。LWT组入院时主要涉及的器官系统衰竭是中枢神经系统(52%),UR组是心血管系统(54%)。与BD组相比,LWT组严重慢性病(37%)和免疫抑制(19%)更为普遍。LWT组从入院到死亡的时间比UR组(10小时)和BD组(54小时)更长(中位数 = 119小时)。10%的脑死亡患者成为器官移植供体。67%的脑死亡患者存在器官捐献的医学禁忌:在61%的潜在病例中,父母不接受器官捐献。30例死亡(12%)似乎是可以避免的;急性感染性肠胃炎导致的脱水(n = 7)是可避免死亡的最常见原因。

结论

我们PICU的死亡方式在统计学上与北美四个PICU中的两个所见的死亡方式没有差异;限制和/或停止治疗的发生率低于另外两个PICU,但患者群体差异很大(存在新生儿和许多心血管手术患者)。在未来的研究中,必须对入院时疾病的严重程度和幸存者的功能结局进行评估。

相似文献

1
[Modality and causes of 259 deaths in a pediatric intensive care unit].[儿科重症监护病房259例死亡的方式及原因]
Arch Pediatr. 1995 Aug;2(8):735-41. doi: 10.1016/0929-693x(96)81242-5.
2
Brain death in children: a retrospective review of patients at a paediatric intensive care unit.儿童脑死亡:儿科重症监护病房患者的回顾性研究。
Hong Kong Med J. 2020 Apr;26(2):120-126. doi: 10.12809/hkmj198126. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
3
[Modes of death in the PICU of a tertiary care hospital].[三级护理医院儿科重症监护病房的死亡模式]
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2001 Oct-Dec;47(4):325-31. doi: 10.1590/s0104-42302001000400035.
4
Timing and modes of death after pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation.儿科院外心脏骤停复苏后死亡的时间和模式。
Resuscitation. 2018 Dec;133:160-166. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.08.014. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
5
Characteristics of deaths in paediatric intensive care: a 10-year study.儿科重症监护病房死亡病例的特征:一项为期10年的研究。
Nurs Crit Care. 2009 Sep-Oct;14(5):235-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2009.00348.x.
6
Epidemiology of Brain Death in Pediatric Intensive Care Units in the United States.美国儿科重症监护病房脑死亡的流行病学。
JAMA Pediatr. 2019 May 1;173(5):469-476. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.0249.
7
Circumstances surrounding dying in the paediatric intensive care unit.儿科重症监护病房中的临终情况。
BMC Pediatr. 2006 Aug 7;6:22. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-6-22.
8
Brain death: medical management in seven Brazilian pediatric intensive care units.脑死亡:巴西七个儿科重症监护病房的医疗管理
J Pediatr (Rio J). 2007 Mar-Apr;83(2):133-40. doi: 10.2223/JPED.1594. Epub 2007 Feb 23.
9
Epidemiology of death in the PICU at five U.S. teaching hospitals*.美国五家教学医院儿科重症监护病房的死亡流行病学*
Crit Care Med. 2014 Sep;42(9):2101-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000498.
10
[Modes of dying of children in Intensive Care Units in Spain: MOMUCIP study].[西班牙重症监护病房儿童的死亡方式:MOMUCIP研究]
An Pediatr (Engl Ed). 2019 Oct;91(4):228-236. doi: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2019.01.016. Epub 2019 Feb 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Demographic profile and outcome analysis of pediatric intensive care patients.儿科重症监护患者的人口统计学特征及预后分析
Hippokratia. 2011 Oct;15(4):316-22.
2
Ethical debate: The distinction between withdrawing life sustaining treatment under the influence of paralysing agents and euthanasia. Are we treading a fine line?伦理辩论:在麻痹药物影响下停止维持生命治疗与安乐死之间的区别。我们是否在走钢丝?
BMJ. 2001 Aug 18;323(7309):388-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7309.388.
3
The decision making process regarding the withdrawal or withholding of potential life-saving treatments in a children's hospital.
儿童医院中关于撤除或停止使用潜在的挽救生命治疗措施的决策过程。
J Med Ethics. 2000 Oct;26(5):346-52. doi: 10.1136/jme.26.5.346.