• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氯雷他定对中重度哮喘无效。

Lack of effect of loratadine on moderate to severe asthma.

作者信息

Ekström T, Osterman K, Zetterström O

机构信息

Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Linköping University Hospital.

出版信息

Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1995 Sep;75(3):287-9.

PMID:7552933
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Antihistamines have been shown to be effective in patients with allergic asthma, but their role in chronic and more severe asthma is uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether loratadine, a selective H1 receptor antagonist, given as an adjunct to standard asthma medication would have any effect in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma.

METHODS

Thirty-five patients with moderate-to-severe asthma, most receiving inhaled steroids, were enrolled in this double-blind, crossover study. In addition to their maintenance therapy patients received either loratadine, 20 mg once daily, or placebo for 4 weeks before crossing over to the other preparation for a further 4 weeks. Variables of efficacy were daily and nocturnal respiratory symptoms, lung function (PEF, FEV1, FVC), and bronchodilator use.

RESULTS

Three subjects were withdrawn from the study because of deteriorating asthma. There was a trend in favor of loratadine treatment with regard to global assessment of drug efficacy but the difference was not statistically significant. There was no objective improvement in asthma control comparing loratadine with placebo but if each treatment week were compared with the run-in period, PEF was significantly (P < .01) improved during the initial phase of loratadine treatment. This effect gradually decreased with time, suggesting tolerance to any bronchodilatory effect of the antihistamine.

CONCLUSION

Loratadine, given as an adjunct to standard asthma therapy, has little if any role to play in the treatment of moderate-to-severe asthma.

摘要

背景

抗组胺药已被证明对过敏性哮喘患者有效,但其在慢性和更严重哮喘中的作用尚不确定。

目的

评估作为标准哮喘药物辅助用药的选择性H1受体拮抗剂氯雷他定对中重度哮喘患者是否有任何效果。

方法

35例中重度哮喘患者(大多数正在接受吸入性类固醇治疗)被纳入这项双盲交叉研究。除维持治疗外,患者在交叉使用另一种制剂再治疗4周之前,接受氯雷他定(每日一次,20毫克)或安慰剂治疗4周。疗效变量包括每日和夜间呼吸道症状、肺功能(呼气峰流速、第一秒用力呼气容积、用力肺活量)以及支气管扩张剂的使用情况。

结果

3名受试者因哮喘病情恶化退出研究。在药物疗效的整体评估方面有支持氯雷他定治疗的趋势,但差异无统计学意义。与安慰剂相比,氯雷他定在哮喘控制方面没有客观改善,但如果将每个治疗周与导入期进行比较,氯雷他定治疗初始阶段的呼气峰流速显著改善(P <.01)。这种效果随时间逐渐降低,提示对该抗组胺药的任何支气管扩张作用产生了耐受性。

结论

作为标准哮喘治疗的辅助用药,氯雷他定在中重度哮喘治疗中几乎没有作用。

相似文献

1
Lack of effect of loratadine on moderate to severe asthma.氯雷他定对中重度哮喘无效。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1995 Sep;75(3):287-9.
2
A randomized study comparing the effect of loratadine added to montelukast with montelukast, loratadine, and beclomethasone monotherapies in patients with chronic asthma.一项随机研究,比较在慢性哮喘患者中,孟鲁司特联合氯雷他定与孟鲁司特、氯雷他定及倍氯米松单药治疗的效果。
J Asthma. 2009 Jun;46(5):465-9. doi: 10.1080/02770900902846323.
3
A 12-week, multicenter, randomized, partially blinded, active-controlled, parallel-group study of budesonide inhalation suspension in adolescents and adults with moderate to severe persistent asthma previously receiving inhaled corticosteroids with a metered-dose or dry powder inhaler.一项为期12周的多中心、随机、部分盲法、活性药物对照、平行组研究,旨在评估布地奈德吸入混悬液用于此前使用定量气雾剂或干粉吸入器吸入皮质类固醇治疗的中度至重度持续性哮喘青少年和成人患者的疗效。
Clin Ther. 2007 Jun;29(6):1013-26. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.06.005.
4
The bronchodilatory effects of loratadine, terbutaline, and both together versus placebo in childhood asthma.氯雷他定、特布他林及其联合用药与安慰剂相比对儿童哮喘的支气管扩张作用。
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2003;13(3):189-92.
5
Efficacy and safety of formoterol Turbuhaler when added to inhaled corticosteroid treatment in children with asthma.福莫特罗都保添加到吸入性糖皮质激素治疗哮喘儿童中的疗效与安全性。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2004 Feb;37(2):122-7. doi: 10.1002/ppul.10404.
6
Efficacy and tolerability of loratadine versus fexofenadine in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis: a double-blind comparison with crossover treatment of nonresponders.氯雷他定与非索非那定治疗季节性变应性鼻炎的疗效和耐受性:对无反应者交叉治疗的双盲比较
Clin Ther. 2000 Jun;22(6):760-9. doi: 10.1016/S0149-2918(00)90009-2.
7
A comparison of the efficacy of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray and loratadine, alone and in combination, for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.丙酸氟替卡松水性鼻喷雾剂与氯雷他定单独及联合使用治疗季节性变应性鼻炎的疗效比较。
J Fam Pract. 1998 Aug;47(2):118-25.
8
Salmeterol xinafoate in children on high dose inhaled steroids.接受高剂量吸入性类固醇治疗的儿童使用昔萘酸沙美特罗。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1995 Nov;75(5):423-8.
9
Efficacy and safety of mizolastine 10 mg in a placebo-controlled comparison with loratadine in chronic idiopathic urticaria: results of the MILOR Study.10毫克咪唑斯汀与氯雷他定治疗慢性特发性荨麻疹的安慰剂对照比较研究:MILOR研究结果
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 1999 Jan;12(1):16-24.
10
[Effects of H1 blocker and inhaled corticosteroids on asthmatic patients with allergic rhinitis].[H1受体阻滞剂与吸入性糖皮质激素对合并过敏性鼻炎的哮喘患者的影响]
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2003 Mar;26(3):157-60.

引用本文的文献

1
New insights into the second generation antihistamines.第二代抗组胺药的新见解。
Drugs. 2001;61(2):207-36. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200161020-00006.