Uusaro A, Ruokonen E, Takala J
Department of Intensive Care, Kuopio University Hospital, Finland.
Cardiovasc Res. 1995 Jul;30(1):106-12. doi: 10.1016/0008-6363(95)00007-0.
Measurement of splanchnic blood flow is necessary to evaluate the effect of therapeutic interventions on splanchnic tissue perfusion. Systemic indocyanine green (ICG) clearance has been used to estimate splanchnic blood flow, but the results may be compromised by altered hepatic dye extraction. We evaluated the applicability of simultaneous estimation of splanchnic and femoral blood flow by dye dilution and regional blood sampling in intensive care patients.
240 simultaneous determinations of regional blood flow were conducted in different patient groups (cardiac surgery, ARDS, pancreatitis, septic shock, preoperative controls). The measurement protocol consists of catheterizations of hepatic vein, femoral artery and vein and primed constant infusion of two different ICG preparations.
The method was used successfully in a wide variety of patients. Steady-state dye concentration and sufficient dye extraction was achieved in each group of patients. The coefficient of variation of splanchnic blood flow estimation was 7 +/- 1% and of femoral blood flow estimation 6 +/- 0%. There was a great intra- and interindividual variation of ICG extraction. Use of dobutamine modified the extraction in most patients but did not lessen the performance of the method. ICG extraction was markedly lower and the coefficient of variation of both femoral and splanchnic blood flow markedly higher with propylene glycol-dissolved ICG preparation as compared with the freeze-dried.
The prerequisites for the method of primed, constant infusion of indocyanine green with hepatic vein catheterization are achieved in intensive care patients. The results of splanchnic blood flow estimations based on techniques with peripheral blood sampling should be interpreted with caution, and the use of ICG clearance as a flow-related indicator without the measurement of ICG extraction cannot be justified because of the great variability of dye extraction. Certain indocyanine green preparations may greatly modify the results of the regional blood flow determinations.
测量内脏血流对于评估治疗干预措施对内脏组织灌注的影响很有必要。全身吲哚菁绿(ICG)清除率已被用于估计内脏血流,但结果可能会因肝脏染料摄取的改变而受到影响。我们评估了在重症监护患者中通过染料稀释和区域血样采集同时估计内脏和股动脉血流的适用性。
在不同患者组(心脏手术、急性呼吸窘迫综合征、胰腺炎、感染性休克、术前对照组)中进行了240次区域血流的同时测定。测量方案包括肝静脉、股动脉和静脉插管以及两种不同ICG制剂的预充式恒速输注。
该方法在多种患者中成功应用。每组患者均实现了稳态染料浓度和足够的染料摄取。内脏血流估计的变异系数为7±1%,股动脉血流估计的变异系数为6±0%。ICG摄取存在较大的个体内和个体间差异。大多数患者使用多巴酚丁胺会改变摄取,但并未降低该方法的性能。与冻干的ICG制剂相比,丙二醇溶解的ICG制剂的ICG摄取明显更低,股动脉和内脏血流的变异系数明显更高。
在重症监护患者中实现了预充式恒速输注吲哚菁绿并进行肝静脉插管方法的前提条件。基于外周血样采集技术的内脏血流估计结果应谨慎解释,由于染料摄取的巨大变异性,在未测量ICG摄取的情况下将ICG清除率用作与血流相关的指标是不合理的。某些吲哚菁绿制剂可能会极大地改变区域血流测定的结果。