Hammond J M, Potgieter P D, Hanslo D, Scott H, Roditi D
Respiratory Intensive Care Unit, Groote Schuur Hospital, South Africa.
Chest. 1995 Oct;108(4):937-41. doi: 10.1378/chest.108.4.937.
To determine the spectrum and antibiotic susceptibility patterns of microorganisms causing acute community-acquired lung abscess.
A prospective survey.
Medical emergency department and wards of a tertiary teaching hospital.
Thirty-four adult patients with both clinical and radiologic features compatible with a diagnosis of acute community-acquired lung abscess who had received less than 48 h of antibiotic therapy.
Microbiologic specimens obtained by percutaneous lung aspiration and with a protected specimen brush via fiberoptic bronchoscopy were submitted for aerobic and anaerobic culture.
Identification of all microorganisms, including anaerobes, and determination of antibiotic susceptibility.
A mean of 2.3 bacterial species per patient was isolated, anaerobes alone being isolated in 44% of cases, aerobes alone in 19%, and mixed aerobic and anaerobic isolates in 22%. Aerobic Gram-negative pathogens were uncommon. In seven patients, Mycobacterium tuberculosis was identified; in two it was associated with other bacteria. In four patients, no organisms were isolated. All the nonmycobacterial isolates were susceptible to amoxicillin-clavulanate and in addition the anaerobes were all susceptible to chloramphenicol and almost all to a combination of penicillin and metronidazole. Among the anaerobes, the level of resistance to penicillin, metronidazole, and clindamycin individually was 21%, 12%, and 5%, respectively.
Community-acquired acute lung abscess is usually caused by multiple anaerobic and less frequently aerobic Gram-positive microorganisms, which should respond to empirical therapy with amoxicillin-clavulanate, chloramphenicol, or a combination of penicillin and metronidazole. Tuberculosis, which may be indistinguishable from an acute lung abscess, occurred in 21% of patients in our study. Most bacterial pathogens are sensitive to conventional antimicrobial therapy and further investigation with percutaneous lung aspiration or bronchoscopy is indicated only when there is lack of early response to therapy or there is the presence of atypical clinical features.
确定引起急性社区获得性肺脓肿的微生物种类及其抗生素敏感性模式。
前瞻性调查。
一所三级教学医院的急诊科和病房。
34例成年患者,具有与急性社区获得性肺脓肿诊断相符的临床和放射学特征,且接受抗生素治疗少于48小时。
经皮肺穿刺获取的微生物标本以及通过纤维支气管镜用防污染标本刷获取的标本,进行需氧和厌氧培养。
鉴定所有微生物,包括厌氧菌,并确定抗生素敏感性。
每位患者平均分离出2.3种细菌,仅厌氧菌分离出的病例占44%,仅需氧菌分离出的病例占19%,需氧菌和厌氧菌混合分离出的病例占22%。需氧革兰阴性病原体不常见。7例患者鉴定出结核分枝杆菌;2例与其他细菌相关。4例患者未分离出微生物。所有非结核分枝杆菌分离株对阿莫西林-克拉维酸敏感,此外厌氧菌均对氯霉素敏感,几乎所有厌氧菌对青霉素和甲硝唑联合用药敏感。在厌氧菌中,对青霉素、甲硝唑和克林霉素的单独耐药率分别为21%、12%和5%。
社区获得性急性肺脓肿通常由多种厌氧微生物引起,需氧革兰阳性微生物引起的情况较少见,这些微生物对阿莫西林-克拉维酸、氯霉素或青霉素与甲硝唑联合的经验性治疗应有效。在我们的研究中,21%的患者出现了可能与急性肺脓肿难以区分的结核病。大多数细菌病原体对传统抗菌治疗敏感,仅在对治疗缺乏早期反应或存在非典型临床特征时,才需要通过经皮肺穿刺或支气管镜进行进一步检查。