Rey J M, Starling J, Wever C, Dossetor D R, Plapp J M
University of Sydney, N.S.W., Australia.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1995 Jul;36(5):787-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1995.tb01329.x.
Four studies on the inter-rater reliability of a proposed Axis V version for DSM-IV and of the CGAS involving 162 child and adolescent patients and 20 clinicians showed moderate agreement (intraclass correlation: 0.53-0.66). This was comparable to previous versions of Axis V, but lower than that reported for the CGAS. More detailed description of anchor points did not increase reliability nor there were differences in agreement when rating current or previous functioning.
四项关于精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版（DSM-IV）拟议的轴V版本以及儿童大体评定量表（CGAS）评分者间信度的研究，涉及162名儿童和青少年患者以及20名临床医生，结果显示一致性中等（组内相关系数：0.53 - 0.66）。这与轴V的先前版本相当，但低于儿童大体评定量表所报告的一致性。对锚定点的更详细描述并未提高信度，且在对当前或既往功能进行评分时，一致性也没有差异。
