Fogle L L, Glaros A G
Department of Behavioral Science, University of Missouri-Kansas City 64108, USA.
J Dent Res. 1995 Aug;74(8):1496-500. doi: 10.1177/00220345950740081001.
Theoretical studies suggest that facial morphology may confer a mechanical advantage to particular individuals during force production, but not during rest. However, prior studies on the relationship between facial morphology and EMG suffer from various methodological limitations. We examined the hypothesis that facial morphology variables contribute significantly and meaningfully to the variance in masticatory muscle EMG when subjects produce specific levels of interocclusal force, but not when subjects are at rest. Measures of facial morphology included gonial angle, ramus height, and maxillary height, as determined from lateral cephalograms. EMG data were obtained from surface electrodes placed on masseter and temporalis sites. Subjects (N = 96) sat in a darkened, sound-attenuated room while they watched a seven-minute segment of a movie. EMG activity obtained during the last two minutes was used as a baseline period. Using the central incisors, subjects then provided five different force levels ranging from 6.5 to 48 lb in random order on a bite-force device while EMG data were collected. A canonical correlation analysis, performed on the set of predictor variables (age, gender, and facial morphology measurements) and the set of criterion variables (EMG data), showed a significant canonical correlation between the two variable sets while biting, but not at rest. Age, but not the facial morphology variables, was highly related to the canonical variate.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
理论研究表明,面部形态可能在力量产生过程中赋予特定个体机械优势,但在休息时则不然。然而,先前关于面部形态与肌电图(EMG)之间关系的研究存在各种方法学上的局限性。我们检验了以下假设:当受试者产生特定水平的咬合间力时,面部形态变量对咀嚼肌肌电图的变化有显著且有意义的贡献,但在受试者休息时则不然。面部形态的测量包括从侧位头影测量片确定的下颌角、下颌升支高度和上颌高度。肌电图数据从放置在咬肌和颞肌部位的表面电极获得。受试者(N = 96)坐在黑暗、隔音的房间里观看一段七分钟的电影片段。在最后两分钟获得的肌电图活动用作基线期。然后,受试者使用中切牙在咬力装置上以随机顺序提供从6.5到48磅的五种不同力水平,同时收集肌电图数据。对预测变量集(年龄、性别和面部形态测量)和标准变量集(肌电图数据)进行的典型相关分析表明,在咬合时两个变量集之间存在显著的典型相关性,但在休息时则不然。年龄与典型变量高度相关,而面部形态变量则不然。(摘要截断于250字)