Suppr超能文献

认知受损老年人的临床试验:家庭评估与门诊评估

Clinical trials in cognitively impaired older adults: home versus clinic assessments.

作者信息

Bédard M, Molloy D W, Standish T, Guyatt G H, D'Souza J, Mondadori C, Darzins P J

机构信息

Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 1995 Oct;43(10):1127-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1995.tb07013.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the reliability of instruments used in clinical trials involving cognitively impaired older adults when the instruments are administered in-home rather than in-clinic and to compare withdrawal rates is these two groups.

DESIGN

This study was part of a larger n-of-1 clinical trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of a MAO/A inhibitor (Brofaromine) in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Participants were initially assessed at the clinic (baseline) and then randomly allocated to in-home or in-clinic assessments for the remainder of the trial. The baseline and second assessment (performed before initiation of the treatment) were used for the reliability analysis. Withdrawal rates were examined over the course of the 6-month trial.

SETTING

Assessments took place at a geriatric clinic in an urban university teaching hospital and at residences of some of the patients.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty-six Alzheimer's disease patients participated in the study, of which, 22 were randomized to in-home assessments and 24 to in-clinic assessments.

MEASUREMENTS

Test-retest reliability was measured for all five instruments used in the study and was based on the first two assessments. Sample size requirements, based on within-group variance, were calculated. Withdrawal rates were obtained for the total duration of the trial.

RESULTS

Test-retest reliability of the instruments, as determined by intraclass correlations, was good in both groups but favored in-clinic for all but one instrument (range: 0.47-0.90 for in-home vs 0.57-0.92 for in-clinic). Sample size requirements based on reliability assessment data were found to be larger for some instruments when administered in-home. Only four in-home patients withdrew before completion of the study, compared with eight in-clinic patients.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest the in-home assessments in cognitively impaired older adults may result in lower withdrawal rates but may necessitate larger sample sizes to offset larger test-retest variability.

摘要

目的

比较在认知功能受损的老年人参与的临床试验中,在家中而非在诊所使用相关工具时的可靠性,并比较两组的退出率。

设计

本研究是一项更大规模的n-of-1临床试验的一部分,旨在调查一种单胺氧化酶/ A抑制剂(溴法罗明)对阿尔茨海默病患者的疗效和安全性。参与者最初在诊所进行评估(基线),然后在试验的剩余时间里随机分配到在家中或在诊所进行评估。基线和第二次评估(在治疗开始前进行)用于可靠性分析。在6个月的试验过程中检查退出率。

地点

评估在城市大学教学医院的老年诊所和一些患者的住所进行。

参与者

46名阿尔茨海默病患者参与了该研究,其中22名被随机分配到在家中评估,24名被分配到在诊所评估。

测量

对研究中使用的所有五种工具进行重测可靠性测量,并基于前两次评估。根据组内方差计算样本量要求。获得试验总持续时间的退出率。

结果

通过组内相关系数确定的工具重测可靠性在两组中都很好,但除一种工具外,其他所有工具在诊所的可靠性更高(范围:在家中为0.47 - 0.90,在诊所为0.57 - 0.92)。发现基于可靠性评估数据的样本量要求在一些在家中使用的工具上更大。在研究完成前,只有4名在家中评估的患者退出,而在诊所评估的患者有8名退出。

结论

结果表明,对认知功能受损的老年人进行在家中评估可能会导致较低的退出率,但可能需要更大的样本量来抵消更大的重测变异性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验