Jerrell J M, Ridgely M S
Department of Neuropsychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, South Carolina 29203, USA.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1995 Sep;183(9):566-76. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199509000-00002.
This study examines the rationale for and relative effectiveness of three intervention models for treating people with severe mental illness and substance abuse disorders: Twelve Step recovery, behavioral skills training, and intensive case management. Using clinical trial methods, 132 dually diagnosed clients were assigned to three service approaches. Changes in client psychosocial outcomes, and psychiatric and substance abuse symptomatology were tracked over a 24-month period. Differential effectiveness was evident, with clients in the behavioral skills group demonstrating the most positive and significant differences in psychosocial functioning and symptomatology, compared with the Twelve Step recovery approach. However, the case management intervention also resulted in several positive and important differences compared with the Twelve Step recovery approach. We also found significant changes over time, not only at 6 months but increasingly positive changes in psychosocial functioning at 12 and 18 months as well. These results underscore the need for clinical trials to further examine the relative cost effectiveness of treatment approaches for dually disordered clients and to incorporate means of assessing subgroup differences so that the interventions being tested can be further refined and targeted to a broad set of needs among the dually diagnosed.
十二步康复法、行为技能训练和强化个案管理。采用临床试验方法,将132名双重诊断的患者分配到三种服务方式中。在24个月的时间里跟踪患者心理社会结局、精神症状和物质使用症状的变化。不同干预模式的效果差异明显,与十二步康复法相比,行为技能训练组的患者在心理社会功能和症状方面表现出最积极、显著的差异。然而,与十二步康复法相比,个案管理干预也产生了一些积极且重要的差异。我们还发现,随着时间推移有显著变化,不仅在6个月时如此,在12个月和18个月时心理社会功能的改善也越来越明显。这些结果强调了进行临床试验的必要性,以便进一步研究针对双重障碍患者的治疗方法的相对成本效益,并纳入评估亚组差异的方法,从而能够进一步完善所测试的干预措施,并针对双重诊断患者的广泛需求进行精准治疗。