Kodama Y, Kuranari M, Kodama H, Fujii I, Takeyama M
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Oita Medical University, Japan.
J Pharm Sci. 1995 Jul;84(7):835-9. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600840710.
We retrospectively evaluated the ability of equations with in vivo population binding parameters of our previous study (Method 1) or an average unbound fraction of 0.25 of Pynnönen (Method 2) to predict the unbound serum carbamazepine (CBZ) concentration in 50 serum samples from 28 polytherapy pediatric patients with epilepsy. In 12 serum samples from 10 patients, the ability of equations for unbound serum carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide (CBZ-E) concentration prediction was also determined in predictive performance with in vivo population binding parameters of our previous study (Method A) or an average unbound fraction of 0.5 of Pynnönen (Method B). Mean prediction error, mean absolute prediction error (MAE), and root mean squared error (RMSE) were calculated for each method, and these values served as a measure of prediction bias and precision. Method 1 shows a bias to underpredict unbound serum CBZ. The MAE and RMSE were lower in Method 2 (MAE = 0.696 microM, RMSE = 0.912 microM) than in Method 1 (MAE = 0.946 microM, RMSE = 1.138 microM). Method 2 is superior to Method 1 in accuracy and precision. The effects of antiepileptic co-medications on predictive performance of Method 1 are relatively larger in a co-medicated group of serum samples with valproic acid (n = 33, MAE = 0.994 microM, RMSE = 1.211 microM) than in a group of serum samples without valproic acid co-medication (n = 17, MAE = 0.853 microM, RMSE = 0.979 microM).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
我们回顾性评估了使用我们之前研究中的体内群体结合参数的方程(方法1)或Pynnönen平均未结合分数0.25的方程(方法2)预测28例接受联合治疗的小儿癫痫患者的50份血清样本中未结合血清卡马西平(CBZ)浓度的能力。在来自10例患者的12份血清样本中,还使用我们之前研究中的体内群体结合参数(方法A)或Pynnönen平均未结合分数0.5(方法B),确定了预测未结合血清卡马西平-10,11-环氧化物(CBZ-E)浓度方程的预测性能。计算了每种方法的平均预测误差、平均绝对预测误差(MAE)和均方根误差(RMSE),这些值作为预测偏差和精度的度量。方法1显示出低估未结合血清CBZ的偏差。方法2的MAE和RMSE(MAE = 0.696微摩尔/升,RMSE = 0.912微摩尔/升)低于方法1(MAE = 0.946微摩尔/升,RMSE = 1.138微摩尔/升)。方法2在准确性和精度方面优于方法1。在联合使用丙戊酸的血清样本组(n = 33,MAE = 0.994微摩尔/升,RMSE = 1.211微摩尔/升)中,抗癫痫联合用药对方法1预测性能的影响相对大于未联合使用丙戊酸的血清样本组(n = 17,MAE = 0.853微摩尔/升,RMSE = 0.979微摩尔/升)。(摘要截断于250字)