• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

田纳西医疗保健计划——田纳西州的医疗系统改革。

TennCare--health system reform for Tennessee.

作者信息

Mirvis D M, Chang C F, Hall C J, Zaar G T, Applegate W B

机构信息

Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee, Memphis 38163, USA.

出版信息

JAMA. 1995 Oct 18;274(15):1235-41. doi: 10.1001/jama.274.15.1235.

DOI:10.1001/jama.274.15.1235
PMID:7563515
Abstract

TennCare, the health care system reform plan implemented in Tennessee on January 1, 1994, was developed with the dual objectives of controlling the rapidly rising cost of the state's Medicaid program and extending health insurance coverage to most Tennesseans without access to employer-sponsored or other government-sponsored health insurance. Beneficiaries enroll in competing, state-chartered managed care organizations that are responsible for providing broad preventive, inpatient, and outpatient services and are reimbursed by the state on a capitation basis at a rate based on a statewide global budget for health care. The program initially proposed to enroll up to 1,775,000 citizens and was projected to result in a cumulative cost savings to Tennessee and the federal government of $7.2 billion by the end of the 5-year demonstration period. However, major start-up problems encountered by the state and by managed care organizations and limitations imposed by the government have significantly constrained these expectations. At the end of its first year, more than 1.2 million citizens were enrolled, but the program incurred a $99 million deficit. Managed care organizations and hospitals have reported major financial problems, and constituency groups--especially those representing physicians--have attempted to block the program. Our objective is to describe the design and rationale of TennCare and discuss key issues the plan continues to face that may affect its long-term success.

摘要

田纳西医疗保健计划于1994年1月1日在田纳西州实施,是一项医疗保健系统改革计划,其制定有双重目标:控制该州医疗补助计划迅速上涨的成本,并将医疗保险覆盖范围扩大到大多数无法获得雇主提供或其他政府提供的医疗保险的田纳西州居民。受益者加入相互竞争的、由州特许的管理式医疗组织,这些组织负责提供广泛的预防、住院和门诊服务,并由州政府按人头付费的方式,根据全州医疗保健总预算确定的费率进行报销。该计划最初提议招收多达177.5万名公民,预计到5年示范期结束时,田纳西州和联邦政府将累计节省72亿美元。然而,该州和管理式医疗组织遇到的重大启动问题以及政府施加的限制,严重限制了这些预期。在第一年年底,超过120万公民登记加入,但该计划出现了9900万美元的赤字。管理式医疗组织和医院报告了重大财务问题,选民团体——尤其是代表医生的团体——试图阻止该计划。我们旨在描述田纳西医疗保健计划的设计和基本原理,并讨论该计划持续面临的可能影响其长期成功的关键问题。

相似文献

1
TennCare--health system reform for Tennessee.田纳西医疗保健计划——田纳西州的医疗系统改革。
JAMA. 1995 Oct 18;274(15):1235-41. doi: 10.1001/jama.274.15.1235.
2
Principal-agent theory: a framework for improving health care reform in Tennessee.委托代理理论:改善田纳西州医疗改革的框架
J Health Hum Serv Adm. 2000 Winter;22(3):277-91.
3
TennCare--Medicaid managed care in Tennessee in jeopardy.田纳西医疗补助计划——田纳西州的医疗补助管理式医疗陷入危机。
Am J Manag Care. 2002 Jan;8(1):57-68.
4
A government purchaser perspective: TennCare--strengthening the safety net.
Cancer. 1998 May 15;82(10 Suppl):2000-2. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19980515)82:10+<2000::aid-cncr4>3.3.co;2-#.
5
TennCare: Tennessee's answer to runaway Medicaid costs.田纳西医疗补助计划:田纳西州应对失控的医疗补助成本的举措。
Manag Care Q. 1999 Spring;7(2):6-14.
6
Covering the uninsured through TennCare: does it make a difference?通过田纳西医疗补助计划覆盖未参保者:这有作用吗?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2001 Jan-Feb;20(1):231-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.20.1.231.
7
Managed care and Medicaid reform in Tennessee: the impact of TennCare on access and health-seeking behavior.田纳西州的管理式医疗与医疗补助改革: TennCare对医疗服务可及性及就医行为的影响
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 1999 Aug;10(3):328-37. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2010.0656.
8
New TennCare program improves service with carve-out.新的田纳西医疗补助计划通过分割业务来改善服务。
Behav Healthc Tomorrow. 1997 Feb;6(1):57-9.
9
TennCare and academic medical centers: the lessons from Tennessee.田纳西医疗补助计划与学术医疗中心:来自田纳西州的经验教训
JAMA. 1996 Sep 4;276(9):672-6.
10
TennCare: reforming Medicaid with markets. Tennessee's year-old Medicaid reform is working.
Health Syst Rev. 1995 May-Jun;28(3):22-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Respiratory syncytial virus immunoprophylaxis in high-risk infants and development of childhood asthma.高危婴儿呼吸道合胞病毒免疫预防与儿童哮喘的发生
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 Jan;139(1):66-71.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.01.055. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
2
Association of folic acid supplementation during pregnancy and infant bronchiolitis.孕期补充叶酸与婴儿毛细支气管炎的关系。
Am J Epidemiol. 2014 Apr 15;179(8):938-46. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwu019. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
3
Sickle cell trait, hemoglobin C trait, and invasive pneumococcal disease.
镰状细胞特征、血红蛋白 C 特征与侵袭性肺炎球菌病。
Epidemiology. 2010 May;21(3):340-6. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181d61af8.
4
The severity-dependent relationship of infant bronchiolitis on the risk and morbidity of early childhood asthma.婴儿细支气管炎严重程度与儿童早期哮喘风险及发病率的相关性
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 May;123(5):1055-61, 1061.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.02.021. Epub 2009 Apr 10.
5
The TennCare graduate medical education plan: ten years later.田纳西医疗补助研究生医学教育计划:十年之后
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Sep;22(9):1365-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0268-3. Epub 2007 Jul 4.
6
Lipid-lowering agents and the risk of hip fracture in a Medicaid population.医疗补助人群中降脂药物与髋部骨折风险
Inj Prev. 2002 Dec;8(4):276-9. doi: 10.1136/ip.8.4.276.
7
Association between the inception of a SAFE KIDS Coalition and changes in pediatric unintentional injury rates.安全儿童联盟的成立与儿童意外伤害率变化之间的关联。
Inj Prev. 2002 Sep;8(3):242-5. doi: 10.1136/ip.8.3.242.
8
Safety-net institutions buffer the impact of Medicaid managed care: a multi-method assessment in a rural state.安全网机构缓冲了医疗补助管理式医疗的影响:对一个农村州的多方法评估
Am J Public Health. 2002 Apr;92(4):598-610. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.4.598.
9
The influence of site of care on the content of prenatal care for low-income women.医疗场所对低收入女性产前护理内容的影响。
Matern Child Health J. 1997 Mar;1(1):25-34. doi: 10.1023/a:1026272318642.
10
Healthcare reform in the US. Momentum shifts from federal to state governments.
Pharmacoeconomics. 1996;10 Suppl 2:100-9. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199600102-00016.