Lyra R, Ferracuti F
Quad Criminol Clin. 1978 Jul-Sep;20(3):257-92.
Prof. Lyra discusses in this article the basic problem of criminological sciences, stating that its essential object of study is the determination of the genesis of crime. The Author states that, before defining the crime genesis, it is necessary to outline, through a synthesis of epistemological restructurization of criminology itself. This way, we can develop a conception of Dialectic Criminology, where the term "dialectic" does not necessarily coincide with a marxist posture, but it extends along much more complex and comprehensive parameters. Dialectic Criminology is defined, in Lyra's conception, as a Classified Criminology, synthetizing both the psychological approach (clinical criminology, or micro-criminology), and the sociological approach (sociological criminology or macro-criminology), according to an anthropological basic frame of reference, which constitutes the new and original prerequisite. To this aim, according to Prof. Lyra, it is necessary to overcome merely biological or psychological theories, and the new sociologisms, which cannot explain deviant behavior without falling into dogmatism or relativism. It is necessary to give back to criminology its original ethico-philosophical roots, and to place the problem of crime within a new "praxis" concept, which takes into account the authentic freedom of man, interracting with historical evolution. This way, through Dialectic Criminology, we can overcome the conception of crime and delinquency viewed as counterparts of the concept of Law.
莱拉教授在本文中探讨了犯罪学的基本问题,指出其核心研究对象是犯罪起源的确定。作者认为,在界定犯罪起源之前,有必要通过对犯罪学自身认识论重构的综合来勾勒。这样,我们就能形成一种辩证犯罪学的概念,其中“辩证”一词不一定与马克思主义立场一致,而是沿着更为复杂和全面的参数延伸。在莱拉的概念中,辩证犯罪学被定义为一种分类犯罪学,它根据人类学的基本参照框架,综合了心理学方法(临床犯罪学或微观犯罪学)和社会学方法(社会学犯罪学或宏观犯罪学),这构成了新的且独特的前提条件。为此,莱拉教授认为,有必要克服单纯的生物学或心理学理论以及新的社会学主义,这些理论在解释越轨行为时不是陷入教条主义就是陷入相对主义。有必要让犯罪学回归其原初的伦理哲学根源,并将犯罪问题置于一个新的“实践”概念之中,该概念要考虑到人的真正自由以及与历史演变的相互作用。这样,通过辩证犯罪学,我们就能克服将犯罪和违法视为法律概念对应物的观念。