Blackburn Ronald
Division of Clinical Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
J Pers Disord. 2007 Apr;21(2):142-59. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2007.21.2.142.
The recent debate on the structure of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R: Hare, 1991; 2003) has been presented primarily as a statistical issue, but underlying it are longstanding conceptual issues about the relationship of personality concepts to deviant behavior and of psychopathy to criminality and personality disorder. I discuss these issues in this paper. The antisocial items of the PCL-R seem to reflect a propensity to commit crimes that has long been of interest to criminology. This disposition overlaps with, but differs conceptually from personality dispositions, but these surface dispositions do not provide a causal account of criminality. I present data that indicate that the core personality characteristics of psychopathy are more closely related to narcissistic and histrionic personality disorders than to antisocial personality disorder. Overemphasis on involvement in crime has obscured the nature of psychopathy as a disorder of personality characterised by interpersonally harmful behavior that need not necessarily take criminal form.
近期关于《修订版心理变态量表》(PCL-R:黑尔,1991年;2003年)结构的争论主要呈现为一个统计学问题,但在其背后,存在着关于人格概念与偏差行为的关系以及心理变态与犯罪及人格障碍的关系等长期存在的概念性问题。我将在本文中讨论这些问题。PCL-R中的反社会项目似乎反映了一种犯罪倾向,这一直是犯罪学所关注的。这种倾向与人格倾向相互重叠,但在概念上有所不同,而且这些表面倾向并不能对犯罪行为做出因果解释。我所展示的数据表明,心理变态的核心人格特征与自恋型人格障碍和表演型人格障碍的关系比与反社会型人格障碍更为密切。对犯罪行为的过度强调掩盖了心理变态作为一种人格障碍的本质,其特征是人际间有害行为,不一定采取犯罪形式。