Sclafani F, Starace A
Quad Criminol Clin. 1978 Jul-Sep;20(3):301-76.
The Republic of San Marino adopted a new Penal Code which came into force on Ist January 1975; it replaced the former one of 15th Sept. 1865. After having stated the typical aspects of the Penal Procedure System therein enforceable, the Authors examine the rules concerning criminal responsibility and the danger of committing new crimes. They point out and criticize the relevant contradictions. In explaining the measures regarding punishment and educational rehabilitation provided for by the San Marino's legal system, the Authors later consider them from a juridical and criminological viewpoint. If some reforms must be approved (for example: biopsychical inquiry on the charged person, probation, week-end imprisonments, fines according to the incomes of the condemned, etc.). the Authors stress that some legal provisions may appear useless and unrealistic when one considers the environmental conditions of the little Republic. The Authors conclude that Penal Procedure Law is not in accordance with Penal Law and, consequently, they hope that a new reform will be grounded on the needs arising from the crimes perpetrated in loco. It shall be, however, necessary to plan a co-ordination among the two Codes within a framework of de-criminalization of many acts which are now punishable as crime.
圣马力诺共和国通过了一部新的《刑法典》，该法典于1975年1月1日生效；它取代了1865年9月15日的旧法典。在阐述了其中可实施的刑事诉讼制度的典型方面之后，作者们研究了有关刑事责任和再次犯罪危险的规则。他们指出并批评了相关的矛盾之处。在解释圣马力诺法律制度所规定的惩罚和教育改造措施时，作者们随后从司法和犯罪学的角度对其进行了考量。如果一些改革必须得到批准（例如：对被指控者进行生物心理调查、缓刑、周末监禁、根据被定罪者的收入处以罚款等）。作者们强调，当考虑到这个小共和国的环境状况时，一些法律规定可能显得无用且不切实际。作者们得出结论，刑事诉讼法与刑法不一致，因此，他们希望基于当地所犯罪行产生的需求进行新的改革。然而，有必要在将许多目前作为犯罪予以惩罚的行为非犯罪化的框架内，对这两部法典进行协调。
