Suppr超能文献

儿科住院医师连续性门诊:我们实际做得如何?

Pediatric residents' continuity clinics: how are we really doing?

作者信息

Dumont-Driscoll M C, Barbian L T, Pollock B H

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville 32610, USA.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 1995 Oct;96(4 Pt 1):616-21.

PMID:7567320
Abstract

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) established guidelines in 1989 requiring pediatric residents to attend a continuity clinic (CC) one half-day per week. OBJECTIVE. To assess pediatric residents' CCs, with an emphasis on those factors potentially affecting house staff education and patient care. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS. A multi-item questionnaire designed to assess the educational, administrative, and clinical components of CCs was distributed to all US CC directors. RESULTS. Responses were received from 164 programs (74.9%), which represented more than 90% of all house staff in accredited US pediatric programs. Fifty-five percent of programs acknowledged non-ACGME-approved exemptions from attendance, and 64% changed CC schedules dependent on in-patient rotation assignment. Less than half of the programs had core curricula or didactic conferences. Most programs (76%) were located in hospital clinics. Clinic resources and equipment were often limited; faculty preceptors and nursing and clerical support staff were frequently insufficient in number. On average, PL1s saw four patients per session, whereas PL2s and PL3s saw five. Continuity of care for the patient for phone calls, acute and after-hours visits, and hospitalization was limited. Directors' perceived support for CCs' educational programs ranged from a high of 87% by generalists to a low of 33% by intensivists. CONCLUSIONS. Despite the ACGME directives, many residency programs have not provided the required priority, protected time, or adequate resources for CCs. The recent emphasis on health care reform and primary care medical education highlights the prominent role the CC should play as an important site in our teaching of longitudinal and ambulatory medicine. Departmental support and committed resources necessary to enhance the experience and to meet the educational challenge successfully will be required.

摘要

毕业后医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)于1989年制定了指导方针,要求儿科住院医师每周参加半天的连续性门诊(CC)。目的:评估儿科住院医师的连续性门诊,重点关注那些可能影响住院医师教育和患者护理的因素。设计与参与者:向所有美国连续性门诊主任发放了一份多项目问卷,旨在评估连续性门诊的教育、管理和临床组成部分。结果:收到了164个项目(74.9%)的回复,这些项目代表了美国认可的儿科项目中超过90%的住院医师。55%的项目承认有未经ACGME批准的出勤豁免情况,64%的项目根据住院轮转安排改变了连续性门诊时间表。不到一半的项目有核心课程或教学会议。大多数项目(76%)设在医院门诊。门诊资源和设备往往有限;带教教师以及护理和文书支持人员的数量常常不足。平均而言,PL1(一年级住院医师)每次门诊看4名患者,而PL2(二年级住院医师)和PL3(三年级住院医师)每次看5名患者。患者在电话咨询、急症和非工作时间就诊以及住院方面的连续护理有限。主任们对连续性门诊教育项目的支持率从全科医生的87%到重症医学专家的33%不等。结论:尽管有ACGME的指令,但许多住院医师培训项目并未为连续性门诊提供所需的优先级、受保护时间或充足资源。近期对医疗改革和初级保健医学教育的重视凸显了连续性门诊作为我们纵向和门诊医学教学重要场所应发挥的突出作用。需要部门支持和充足资源,以提升体验并成功应对教育挑战。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验