Medin J, Andreo P, Grusell E, Mattsson O, Montelius A, Roos M
Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Karolinska Institutet and University of Stockholm, Sweden.
Phys Med Biol. 1995 Jul;40(7):1161-76. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/40/7/002.
Determinations of the absorbed dose in a 170 MeV proton beam have been performed using seven ionization chambers of different types: five cylindrical (two FWT IC-18 and three NE-2571, of which one was modified to have the central electrode made of graphite) and two plane parallel (NACP-02 and Roos FK-6). The ionization was converted into absorbed dose in the proton beam according to the generalization of the formalism provided by the IAEA Code of Practice (TRS 277), which enables the use of the same equations for all kinds of beam used in radiotherapy. The absorbed dose obtained with the two IC-18 chambers, a chamber type commonly used as a reference in proton beams, was up to 1.5% lower than that obtained with the Farmer NE-2571 chamber, which was used as the reference in this work when calibration factors in terms of NK were used. To investigate this difference, experimental ND factors for six chambers (the two IC-18 chambers, the NACP-02, the FK-6 and two of the NE-2571 chambers) were determined in a high-energy electron beam. The procedure commonly recommended for plane parallel ion chambers was used for all the chambers, using the same reference chamber, a Farmer NE-2571. In the 170 MeV proton beam all the ND factors yielded consistent absorbed dose determinations within the estimated experimental uncertainties. This finding calls into question the value of the product kattkm for the IC-18 chamber given by the IAEA Code of Practice used in this comparison, and points at possible chamber to chamber variations that theoretical kattkm factors cannot predict. The investigations enabled the determination of the Pwall(60Co) factor of the Roos FK-6 plane parallel chamber, yielding 1.003 +/- 0.5%, and a correction for the effect of the aluminium central electrode of NE-2571 chambers in proton beams, equal to 1.003 +/- 0.4%. Two of the chambers (the plane parallel FK-6 and the modified cylindrical NE-2571) were provided with calibration factors in terms of absorbed dose to water, Nw, at the quality of 60Co by the Primary Standard Dosimetry Laboratory in Germany (PTB). Using the Nw formalism excellent agreement was found with the determination based on the experimental ND, giving support to the implementation of the NW procedure in therapeutic proton beams.
利用七种不同类型的电离室对170兆电子伏特质子束中的吸收剂量进行了测定:五个圆柱形电离室(两个FWT IC - 18和三个NE - 2571,其中一个经过改装,中心电极由石墨制成)和两个平行板电离室(NACP - 02和Roos FK - 6)。根据国际原子能机构实践准则(TRS 277)提供的形式主义的推广,将电离转换为质子束中的吸收剂量,这使得能够对放射治疗中使用的各种束流使用相同的方程。用两个IC - 18室(质子束中常用作参考的室型)获得的吸收剂量比用Farmer NE - 2571室获得的吸收剂量低达1.5%,在使用以NK表示的校准因子时,Farmer NE - 2571室在本工作中用作参考。为了研究这种差异,在高能电子束中测定了六个室(两个IC - 18室、NACP - 02、FK - 6和两个NE - 2571室)的实验性ND因子。对所有室都采用了通常推荐用于平行板电离室的程序,使用相同的参考室,即Farmer NE - 2571。在170兆电子伏特质子束中,所有ND因子在估计的实验不确定度范围内得出了一致的吸收剂量测定结果。这一发现对本比较中使用的国际原子能机构实践准则给出的IC - 18室的kattkm乘积的值提出了质疑,并指出了理论kattkm因子无法预测的室与室之间可能存在的差异。这些研究使得能够确定Roos FK - 6平行板电离室的Pwall(60Co)因子,结果为1.003±0.5%,并对NE - 2571室在质子束中铝制中心电极的影响进行了校正,等于1.003±0.4%。其中两个室(平行板FK - 6和改装后的圆柱形NE - 2571)由德国国家计量研究院(PTB)提供了以60Co质量的水吸收剂量Nw表示的校准因子。使用Nw形式主义,发现与基于实验性ND的测定结果具有极好的一致性,这为在治疗性质子束中实施NW程序提供了支持。