Samdal F, Amland P F, Bugge J F
Department of Plastic Surgery, Norwegian National Hospital, University Hospital of Oslo.
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1995 Jun;29(2):161-5. doi: 10.3109/02844319509034333.
The amount of blood lost during liposuction with the "dry" or classic "wet" techniques has been a cause for concern. In the present study 26 consecutive patients who underwent syringe-assisted liposuction with the "superwet" or "tumescent" technique had their blood loss recorded prospectively. The mean (SD) volume aspirated was 2448 (1368) ml and the mean (SD) drop in haemoglobin concentration was 11 (7) g/l. The haemoglobin concentration was measured in both the fluid and the fat fraction of the aspirate, and the mean (SD) amount of whole blood was 16.5 (9.3) ml/litre of aspirate. The present study shows that blood loss is considerably reduced when the "super-wet" or "tumescent" technique is used, compared with the reported amount lost by authors who used the "dry" or classic "wet" techniques.
采用“干性”或经典“湿性”技术进行抽脂时的失血量一直令人担忧。在本研究中，对26例连续接受“超湿性”或“肿胀性”技术的注射器辅助抽脂患者的失血量进行了前瞻性记录。平均（标准差）吸出量为2448（1368）毫升，血红蛋白浓度平均（标准差）下降11（7）克/升。对吸出物的液体和脂肪部分均测量了血红蛋白浓度，全血平均（标准差）量为每升吸出物16.5（9.3）毫升。本研究表明，与使用“干性”或经典“湿性”技术的作者所报告的失血量相比，采用“超湿性”或“肿胀性”技术时失血量显著减少。
