Park B J, Stergachis A, Scholes D, Heidrich F E, Holmes K K, Stamm W E
Department of Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle 98195, USA.
Am J Epidemiol. 1995 Oct 1;142(7):771-8. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117709.
To evaluate the relation between contraceptive methods and cervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection, the authors studied a population-based sample of 1,779 nonpregnant women aged 15-34 years who underwent cell culture diagnostic testing for the detection of C. trachomatis at a health maintenance organization. Barrier contraceptive method users were classified as those who reported using one of the following methods at time of testing: condom, diaphragm, cervical cap, spermicidal sponge, foam, or vaginal spermicidal suppositories. Barrier methods were associated with a reduction in the risk of chlamydial infection in women aged 25 years or older when compared with all other women in the same age category (adjusted prevalence odds ratio = 0.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04-0.66). When compared with only noncontracepting women, the adjusted prevalence odds ratio was 0.34 (95% CI 0.06-1.99). The protective effect of barrier methods was not evident in women younger than age 25 years. Oral contraceptive use was not associated with the risk of C. trachomatis infection using either referent group; the adjusted prevalence odds ratio was 0.99 (95% CI 0.57-1.73) compared with all other women, and 0.88 (95% CI 0.44-1.79) compared with noncontracepting women. These findings suggest that present patterns of use of barrier methods differ by age and afford only selective protection against cervical C. trachomatis infections.
为评估避孕方法与宫颈沙眼衣原体感染之间的关系,作者对一家健康维护组织中1779名年龄在15 - 34岁的非妊娠女性进行了基于人群的抽样研究,这些女性接受了细胞培养诊断检测以检测沙眼衣原体。屏障避孕法使用者被分类为在检测时报告使用以下方法之一的女性:避孕套、子宫托、宫颈帽、杀精海绵、泡沫剂或阴道杀精栓。与同一年龄组的所有其他女性相比,屏障避孕法与25岁及以上女性衣原体感染风险的降低相关(校正患病率比值比 = 0.15,95%置信区间(CI) 0.04 - 0.66)。与仅未采取避孕措施的女性相比,校正患病率比值比为0.34(95% CI 0.06 - 1.99)。屏障避孕法的保护作用在25岁以下女性中不明显。使用口服避孕药与使用任何一组参照人群的沙眼衣原体感染风险均无关联;与所有其他女性相比,校正患病率比值比为0.99(95% CI 0.57 - 1.73),与未采取避孕措施的女性相比为0.88(95% CI 0.44 - 1.79)。这些发现表明,目前屏障避孕法的使用模式因年龄而异,并且仅对宫颈沙眼衣原体感染提供选择性保护。