• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

模拟宫颈扩张测量的准确性和观察者内变异性。

Accuracy and intraobserver variability of simulated cervical dilatation measurements.

作者信息

Phelps J Y, Higby K, Smyth M H, Ward J A, Arredondo F, Mayer A R

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Sep;173(3 Pt 1):942-5. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90371-2.

DOI:10.1016/0002-9378(95)90371-2
PMID:7573274
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to assess the accuracy and intraobserver variability of clinical cervical diameter measurements among obstetric health care providers.

STUDY DESIGN

Polyvinyl chloride pipes 1 to 10 cm in diameter were mounted in cardboard boxes and used to simulate cervical examinations. The boxes were designed so that the examiner had to rely solely on proprioception to determine the inner diameter.

RESULTS

A total of 1574 simulated cervical diameter measurements were obtained from 102 different examiners in a two-part study. The overall accuracy for determining the exact diameter was 56.3%, which improved to 89.5% when an error of +/- 1 cm was allowed. Intraobserver variability for a given diameter measurement was 52.1%, which decreased to 10.5% when an error of +/- 1 cm was allowed.

CONCLUSIONS

Cervical diameter measurements obtained by digital examination are precise when an error of +/- 1 cm is allowed for. Intraobserver variability is > 50% and is an important consideration when evaluating dysfunctional labor.

摘要

目的

我们的目的是评估产科医护人员临床测量宫颈直径的准确性和观察者内变异性。

研究设计

将直径1至10厘米的聚氯乙烯管安装在硬纸盒中,用于模拟宫颈检查。盒子的设计使得检查者必须完全依靠本体感觉来确定内径。

结果

在一项分为两部分的研究中,从102名不同的检查者那里总共获得了1574次模拟宫颈直径测量值。确定确切直径的总体准确率为56.3%,当允许有±1厘米的误差时,准确率提高到89.5%。给定直径测量的观察者内变异性为52.1%,当允许有±1厘米的误差时,变异性降至10.5%。

结论

当允许有±1厘米的误差时,通过指诊获得的宫颈直径测量值是精确的。观察者内变异性大于50%,在评估产程异常时是一个重要的考虑因素。

相似文献

1
Accuracy and intraobserver variability of simulated cervical dilatation measurements.模拟宫颈扩张测量的准确性和观察者内变异性。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Sep;173(3 Pt 1):942-5. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90371-2.
2
Accuracy and intraobserver variability of simulated cervical dilatation and effacement measurements.
Prim Care Update Ob Gyns. 1998 Jul 1;5(4):185. doi: 10.1016/s1068-607x(98)00102-4.
3
Intrapartum measurement of cervical dilatation using translabial 3-dimensional ultrasonography: correlation with digital examination and interobserver and intraobserver agreement assessment.经阴唇三维超声测量产时宫颈扩张:与指诊的相关性及观察者间和观察者内一致性评估
J Ultrasound Med. 2009 Oct;28(10):1289-96. doi: 10.7863/jum.2009.28.10.1289.
4
Agreement between transperineal ultrasound measurements and digital examinations of cervical dilatation during labor.经会阴超声测量与分娩时宫颈扩张指诊之间的一致性。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Oct 24;15:273. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0704-z.
5
Interobserver reliability of digital and endovaginal ultrasonographic cervical length measurements.数字式和经阴道超声测量宫颈长度的观察者间可靠性
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Oct;177(4):853-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70282-5.
6
Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of ultrasound measurements of cervical length and width in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy.妊娠中晚期宫颈长度和宽度超声测量的观察者内及观察者间可重复性
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Sep;20(3):256-62. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00765.x.
7
Simulation of cervical changes in labour: reproducibility of expert assessment.分娩时宫颈变化的模拟:专家评估的可重复性
Lancet. 1989 Nov 4;2(8671):1089-90. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)91094-5.
8
Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of three-dimensional gray-scale and power Doppler ultrasound examinations of the cervix in pregnant women.孕妇宫颈三维灰阶和能量多普勒超声检查的观察者内及观察者间可重复性
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Aug;26(2):132-7. doi: 10.1002/uog.1884.
9
Cervical effacement: variation in belief among clinicians.宫颈管消退:临床医生之间的观念差异。
Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Jul;78(1):43-5.
10
Cervical assessment: visual or digital?宫颈评估:视诊还是指诊?
J Perinatol. 1996 Mar-Apr;16(2 Pt 1):103-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Alternative approach to monitoring labor: purple line.监测产程的替代方法:紫色线。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Feb 18;25(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07300-0.
2
Intrapartum ultrasound for cervical dilatation: Inter- and intra-observer agreement.产时超声测量宫颈扩张:观察者间及观察者内一致性
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024 Dec;103(12):2455-2464. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14970. Epub 2024 Sep 15.
3
Comparing Transvaginal Ultrasound Measurements of Cervical Length to Bishop Score in Predicting Cesarean Section Following Induction of Labor: A Prospective Observational Study.
比较经阴道超声测量宫颈长度与 Bishop 评分在预测引产术后剖宫产中的作用:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Cureus. 2024 Feb 16;16(2):e54335. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54335. eCollection 2024 Feb.
4
Does Simulation Training Improve the Accuracy of Vaginal Assessment of Labour Progress?模拟训练能否提高产程阴道评估的准确性?
Cureus. 2021 Jul 1;13(7):e16089. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16089. eCollection 2021 Jul.
5
Agreement between transperineal ultrasound measurements and digital examinations of cervical dilatation during labor.经会阴超声测量与分娩时宫颈扩张指诊之间的一致性。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Oct 24;15:273. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0704-z.
6
The diagnostic accuracy of purple line in prediction of labor progress in omolbanin hospital, iran.伊朗奥莫尔巴宁医院紫色线预测产程进展的诊断准确性。
Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014 Nov 16;16(11):e16183. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.16183. eCollection 2014 Nov.
7
Automatic evaluation of progression angle and fetal head station through intrapartum echographic monitoring.通过产时超声监测自动评估进展角度和胎头位置。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2013;2013:278978. doi: 10.1155/2013/278978. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
8
Physiologic partograph to improve birth safety and outcomes among low-risk, nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset.生理产程图改善低危、初产妇自然临产的分娩安全性和结局。
Med Hypotheses. 2012 Feb;78(2):319-26. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2011.11.012. Epub 2011 Dec 3.
9
The purple line as a measure of labour progress: a longitudinal study.紫线作为衡量产程进展的指标:一项纵向研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010 Sep 16;10:54. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-54.
10
Severity of pelvic organ prolapse associated with measurements of pelvic floor function.盆腔器官脱垂的严重程度与盆底功能测量结果相关。
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005 Nov-Dec;16(6):432-6. doi: 10.1007/s00192-004-1274-1. Epub 2005 Jan 20.