Suppr超能文献

宾夕法尼亚州创伤中心的机构及每位外科医生的手术量与生存结果的关系

Institution and per-surgeon volume versus survival outcome in Pennsylvania's trauma centers.

作者信息

Konvolinka C W, Copes W S, Sacco W J

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Guthrie Clinic, Ltd., Sayre, PA 18840, USA.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 1995 Oct;170(4):333-40. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)80299-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The American College of Surgeons recommends minimum patient volumes for trauma centers and surgeons. Those numbers, however, are largely based on results from studies of surgical (but not trauma) relationships between volume and outcome.

METHODS

Using stepwise regression, relationships were sought between measures of patient volume per trauma center and per surgeon and ana severity-controlled measure of survival outcome (W). For significant z values, W is the number of additional (or fewer) survivors, per 100 patients treated, than expected from ASCOT norms. W = 0 when z is nonsignificant. Data are from patients admitted in 1988 and 1989 to accredited Pennsylvania trauma centers.

RESULTS

The relationships found for all patients and for adult blunt-injured patients are W = 0.3312 + 0.0200 (NSER/SURG) and W = 0.3638 + 0.0248 (NBSER/SURG), respectively, where NSER/SURG is the number of seriously, injured patients treated annually per surgeon and NBSER/SURG is the number of adult patients with serious blunt injuries treated annually per surgeon. Serious injury was defined, using the Injury Severity Scale, as > = 13 or, using the Abbreviated Injury Scale, as a head injury of > = 3. The relationships explained 36% and 61% of the variance in W (R2 for all patients and adult blunt-injured patients, respectively. To achieve normative survival (W =0), 95% confidence intervals suggest that a trauma surgeon should treat at least 35 seriously injured patients per year and at least 28 adult patients with serious blunt injury annually. No volume-related variable was a significant contributor to predictions of W for adult patients with penetrating injuries or for pediatric patients.

CONCLUSIONS

These results support the regionalization of trauma care by affirming that increased per-surgeon experience in the treatment of seriously injured patients is associated with improved outcomes and help define the minimum experience needed to achieve normative survival. Prospective study of the relationship between volume and survival and other outcomes is required.

摘要

背景

美国外科医师学会推荐了创伤中心和外科医生的最低患者数量标准。然而,这些数字很大程度上基于手术(而非创伤)量与预后关系的研究结果。

方法

采用逐步回归分析,探寻每个创伤中心和每位外科医生的患者量指标与生存预后的严重程度控制指标(W)之间的关系。对于显著的z值,W表示每治疗100例患者中,比根据ASCOT标准预期的额外(或更少)存活患者数。当z不显著时,W = 0。数据来自1988年和1989年入住宾夕法尼亚州经认可的创伤中心的患者。

结果

所有患者和成年钝性伤患者的关系分别为W = 0.3312 + 0.0200(NSER/SURG)和W = 0.3638 + 0.0248(NBSER/SURG),其中NSER/SURG是每位外科医生每年治疗的重伤患者数量,NBSER/SURG是每位外科医生每年治疗的成年严重钝性伤患者数量。重伤的定义为,使用损伤严重度评分时≥13,或使用简明损伤定级时头部损伤≥3。这些关系分别解释了W中36%和61%的方差(R2分别对应所有患者和成年钝性伤患者)。为达到标准生存(W = 0),95%置信区间表明,创伤外科医生每年应至少治疗35例重伤患者,每年至少治疗28例成年严重钝性伤患者。对于成年穿透伤患者或儿科患者,没有与量相关的变量对W的预测有显著贡献。

结论

这些结果支持创伤治疗的区域化,因为证实了外科医生治疗重伤患者经验的增加与预后改善相关,并有助于确定达到标准生存所需的最低经验。需要对量与生存及其他预后之间的关系进行前瞻性研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验