Lilja G, Kusoffsky E, Johansson S G, Oman H
Sachs' Children's Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Allergy. 1995 Apr;50(4):316-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1995.tb01154.x.
The ability of Phadiatop Paediatric (PP), Phadiatop (P), mixed-food RAST (MF), and the combination of P and MF to identify children with atopic allergy was evaluated among 193 children who had a family history of atopic disease, and who had an average age of 5 years. If atopy is defined as the presence of at least one positive skin prick test (> or = 2+) to common food and/or inhalant allergens, P had a sensitivity of 86%, a specificity of 94%, and an efficacy of 92%. These figures were somewhat better than the results with PP. However, when P was combined with MF, the sensitivity increased to 89%, but at the expense of lowered specificity (83%) and efficacy (84%). If the tests were related only to clinical signs/symptoms of atopic disease, the sensitivity and efficacy were, at maximum, 63% and 81%, respectively. There was a discrepancy between the results of P and PP in 9% of the children. One explanation of this discrepancy may be that PP seems to be incapable of detecting children with respiratory allergies induced by pollens from birch and related trees. The results indicate that in 5-6-year-old children P should be preferred to PP and to the combination of P and MF for atopy screening, at least in places where birch pollen is a common allergen.
在193名有特应性疾病家族史且平均年龄为5岁的儿童中,评估了儿童特异性变应原体外诊断试验(PP)、特异性变应原体外诊断试验(P)、混合食物放射性变应原吸附试验(MF)以及P与MF联合检测对特应性过敏儿童的识别能力。如果将特应性定义为对常见食物和/或吸入性过敏原至少有一项阳性皮肤点刺试验(≥2+),则P的敏感性为86%,特异性为94%,有效性为92%。这些数据比PP的结果略好。然而,当P与MF联合使用时,敏感性提高到89%,但特异性(83%)和有效性(84%)有所降低。如果这些检测仅与特应性疾病的临床体征/症状相关,其敏感性和有效性最高分别为63%和81%。9%的儿童中P和PP的结果存在差异。这种差异的一种解释可能是PP似乎无法检测出由桦树及相关树木花粉引起的呼吸道过敏儿童。结果表明,对于5至6岁的儿童,至少在桦树花粉是常见过敏原的地方,进行特应性筛查时,P比PP以及P与MF联合检测更可取。