Brull S J, Silverman D G
Department of Anesthesiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510-8051, USA.
Anesthesiology. 1995 Oct;83(4):702-9. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199510000-00009.
Although the intensity of neurostimulation (i.e., charge) is a product of current intensity and pulse duration, the effects of the latter on the amplitude of evoked response and subjective discomfort are unknown. Therefore, the authors investigated the effects of current intensity and pulse width, and their interaction with electrode placement and polarity, on force translation (FTR), accelerography (ACG), and electromyography (EMG) at the adductor pollics muscle.
Ulnar stimulating electrodes were applied in one of two configurations: over the distal forearm and olecranon groove ("A") or 5 cm apart on the distal forearm ("B"). Stimuli for FTR and EMG with current intensities of 20, 40, 60, and 70 mA and pulse widths of 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 msec resulted in 16 different charges. These combinations were delivered in each of four orientations: "A-" ("A" configuration with negative electrode distal); "A+", "B-", and "B+" (n = 64 stimuli). Eight stimulus combinations (n = 32 stimuli) were used for ACG. For each monitoring technique, the effects of current intensity, pulse width, electrode polarity, and placement were analyzed with repeated measures ANOVA. Pain responses were scored on a 0-100-mm verbal analog scale and analyzed with ANOVA and Fisher's exact test.
The evoked response amplitude varied directly with current intensity and pulse width. In both electrode placement configurations, the response was greater when the negative electrode was distal. The electrode positioning ("A" vs. "B") had less of an impact on evoked responses than did polarity, regardless of monitoring technique. The evoked pain varied directly with the amplitude of evoked neuromuscular response in all electrode position-polarity combinations.
The total current charge required for evoking a supramaximal neuromuscular response is much higher than previously appreciated, and electrode polarity is important in attaining a supramaximal plateau. Failure to attain (and maintain) a supramaximal stimulus allows changes in the effectiveness of neurostimulation, thus influencing the magnitude of the evoked neuromuscular response and confounding measurements of neuromuscular block.
尽管神经刺激强度(即电荷量)是电流强度与脉冲持续时间的乘积,但后者对诱发反应幅度和主观不适的影响尚不清楚。因此,作者研究了电流强度和脉冲宽度及其与电极放置和极性的相互作用对拇收肌的力平移(FTR)、加速度描记法(ACG)和肌电图(EMG)的影响。
尺神经刺激电极采用两种配置之一:置于前臂远端和鹰嘴沟上方(“A”)或在前臂远端相距5厘米处(“B”)。用于FTR和EMG的刺激,电流强度为20、40、60和70毫安,脉冲宽度为0.05、0.1、0.2和0.4毫秒,产生16种不同的电荷量。这些组合以四种方向中的每一种进行传递:“A-”(负电极在远端的“A”配置);“A+”、“B-”和“B+”(n = 64次刺激)。八种刺激组合(n = 32次刺激)用于ACG。对于每种监测技术,采用重复测量方差分析来分析电流强度、脉冲宽度、电极极性和放置的影响。疼痛反应采用0 - 100毫米言语模拟量表评分,并通过方差分析和Fisher精确检验进行分析。
诱发反应幅度与电流强度和脉冲宽度直接相关。在两种电极放置配置中,当负电极在远端时反应更大。无论监测技术如何,电极定位(“A”与“B”)对诱发反应的影响都小于极性。在所有电极位置 - 极性组合中,诱发疼痛与诱发神经肌肉反应的幅度直接相关。
诱发最大神经肌肉反应所需的总电荷量比之前认为的要高得多,并且电极极性对于达到最大平台很重要。未能达到(并维持)最大刺激会导致神经刺激效果发生变化,从而影响诱发神经肌肉反应的幅度并混淆神经肌肉阻滞的测量。