Ansermino J M, Sanderson P M, Bevan J C, Bevan D R
Department of Anaesthesia, British Columbia's Children's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada.
Can J Anaesth. 1996 Jun;43(6):589-94. doi: 10.1007/BF03011772.
To determine whether detection of residual blockade is improved by using the accelerograph. A secondary objective was to compare acceleromyographic measurements with those obtained by electromyography.
In a prospective, randomized, double-blind investigation, 22 anaesthetized children were studied during recovery from neuromuscular blockade following 0.1 mg.kg-1 vecuronium i.v.. Assessments of depth of block began 10 min after injection and were repeated at one minute intervals using electromyography (Datex, Relaxograph) in one hand, and acceleromyography (Biometer, Tofguard) in the other, to measure response of the adductor pollicis to train-of-four (TOF) stimulation of the ulnar nerve. Monitoring was stopped when no fade was visible and TOF ratio > or = 0.7. The electromyographic (EMG) and acceleromyographic (AMG) data were compared with corresponding observations of the number of twitches and TOF fade in the visible responses of the thumb, made by the attending anaesthetist. The method of Bland and Altman was used to compare differences between AMG and EMG data.
During recovery from neuromuscular blockade, fade was no longer visible clinically 38.6 +/- 10.4 min (mean +/- SD) after the administration of vecuronium. This corresponded to TOF ratios of 0.04 +/- 0.23 by AMG and 0.34 +/- 0.21 by EMG. Usually, two twitches were visible before AMG detected the first twitch. The time to TOF ratio > or = 0.7 by AMG and EMG was similar at 49.1 +/- 10.5 and 50.9 +/- 9.0 min, respectively. The bias between AMG and EMG was one minute, with limits of agreement from -10 to nine min.
AMG is superior to visual assessment in detecting residual neuromuscular block and provides similar estimates of recovering block as the more cumbersome EMG.
确定使用加速度仪是否能改善残余阻滞的检测。次要目的是比较加速度肌电图测量结果与肌电图测量结果。
在一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究中,对22名接受麻醉的儿童在静脉注射0.1mg/kg维库溴铵后从神经肌肉阻滞恢复过程中进行研究。注射后10分钟开始评估阻滞深度,每隔一分钟重复进行评估,一只手使用肌电图(Datex,Relaxograph),另一只手使用加速度肌电图(Biometer,Tofguard),以测量拇内收肌对尺神经四个成串刺激(TOF)的反应。当看不到衰减且TOF比值≥0.7时停止监测。将肌电图(EMG)和加速度肌电图(AMG)数据与主治麻醉医生在拇指可见反应中观察到的抽搐次数和TOF衰减的相应观察结果进行比较。采用Bland和Altman方法比较AMG和EMG数据之间的差异。
在从神经肌肉阻滞恢复过程中,维库溴铵给药后38.6±10.4分钟(平均值±标准差)临床上不再可见衰减。这对应于AMG测得的TOF比值为0.04±0.23,EMG测得的为0.34±0.21。通常在AMG检测到第一次抽搐之前可见两次抽搐。AMG和EMG达到TOF比值≥0.7的时间相似,分别为49.1±10.5分钟和50.9±9.0分钟。AMG和EMG之间的偏差为一分钟,一致性界限为-10至9分钟。
在检测残余神经肌肉阻滞方面,AMG优于视觉评估,并且与更繁琐的EMG相比,在恢复阻滞的评估方面提供了相似的估计。