Suppr超能文献

使用三种黏固剂时金瓷嵌体与离体牙的拉伸粘结强度

Tensile bond strength of gold and porcelain inlays to extracted teeth using three cements.

作者信息

Michelini F S, Belser U C, Scherrer S S, De Rijk W G

机构信息

Department of Fixed Prosthodontics and Occlusion, School of Dentistry, University of Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Int J Prosthodont. 1995 Jul-Aug;8(4):324-31.

PMID:7575974
Abstract

This in vitro study compared the tensile bond strength of gold and porcelain inlays to extracted molars in standardized cavities. Three cements were used: zinc phosphate, glass-ionomer, and a resin composite cement. The gold inlays were cemented using zinc phosphate or glass-ionomer cement, and the porcelain inlays were luted using resin composite or glass-ionomer cement. Surface treatments included, for gold inlays, either no treatment (zinc phosphate cement) or airborne particle abraded and tinplated (glass-ionomer cement); and for porcelain inlays, either no treatment (glass-ionomer cement) or etched and silane-treated (resin composite cement). Statistical analysis was performed using the Weibull distribution. Results showed no significant differences between gold inlays cemented using zinc phosphate or glass-ionomer cements and porcelain inlays luted using glass-ionomer cements. The bonded porcelain inlays (resin composite cement) showed tensile bond strengths two to three times higher than those obtained for cemented gold inlays.

摘要

这项体外研究比较了金嵌体和瓷嵌体与标准化窝洞中的拔除磨牙之间的拉伸粘结强度。使用了三种粘结剂:磷酸锌、玻璃离子水门汀和树脂复合粘结剂。金嵌体使用磷酸锌或玻璃离子水门汀粘结,瓷嵌体使用树脂复合粘结剂或玻璃离子水门汀粘结。表面处理包括,对于金嵌体,要么不处理(磷酸锌粘结剂),要么进行空气颗粒研磨和镀锡处理(玻璃离子水门汀);对于瓷嵌体,要么不处理(玻璃离子水门汀),要么进行蚀刻和硅烷处理(树脂复合粘结剂)。使用威布尔分布进行统计分析。结果表明,使用磷酸锌或玻璃离子水门汀粘结的金嵌体与使用玻璃离子水门汀粘结的瓷嵌体之间没有显著差异。粘结的瓷嵌体(树脂复合粘结剂)的拉伸粘结强度比粘结的金嵌体高两到三倍。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验