Costa O, Lago P, Rocha A P, Freitas J, Puig J, Carvalho M J, de Freitas A F
Faculdade de Medicina do Porto, Cadeira de Clínica Médica, Hospital S. João.
Rev Port Cardiol. 1995 Sep;14(9):621-6.
to compare parametric (AR) and non parametric (FFT) spectral analysis results obtained in 512 beats series.
104 healthy subjects with normal physical examination and electrocardiogram were studied. The Ecg was recorded at rest, with controlled breathing at 15 cycles/min., and sampled at 300 Hz. The spectral VLF, LF and HF were calculated with FFT algorithm. For the same series, an auto-regressive analysis (AR) with optimized choice of the order of the model (AIC criterion) have been computed, VLF, LF and HF components were identified by AR spectral decomposition.
In both groups, athletes and sedentary, there were no statistically differences between VLF, LF, HF and LF/HF spectral indices computed by the two methods.
the results suggest that with controlled breathing it does not seems to exist any advantage in the use of AR spectral analysis to compute spectral components of heart rate variability, which is much more laborious that fixed bands non parametric FFT analysis.
比较在512次心搏序列中获得的参数化(AR)和非参数化(FFT)频谱分析结果。
对104名体格检查和心电图正常的健康受试者进行研究。在静息状态下记录心电图,呼吸控制在每分钟15次,采样频率为300Hz。使用FFT算法计算频谱VLF、LF和HF。对于同一序列,采用模型阶数优化选择(AIC准则)的自回归分析(AR)进行计算,通过AR频谱分解识别VLF、LF和HF成分。
在运动员组和久坐组中,两种方法计算的VLF、LF、HF和LF/HF频谱指数之间均无统计学差异。
结果表明,在呼吸控制的情况下,使用AR频谱分析来计算心率变异性的频谱成分似乎没有任何优势,而且它比固定频段非参数FFT分析要费力得多。