Suppr超能文献

节拍器呼吸对自主神经活动测量变异性的影响。

The effects of metronome breathing on the variability of autonomic activity measurements.

作者信息

Driscoll D, Dicicco G

机构信息

Parker College of Chiropractic, Dallas, Tex., USA.

出版信息

J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000 Nov-Dec;23(9):610-4. doi: 10.1067/mmt.2000.110944.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many chiropractors hypothesize that spinal manipulation affects the autonomic nervous system (ANS). However, the ANS responses to chiropractic manipulative therapy are not well documented, and more research is needed to support this hypothesis. This study represents a step toward the development of a reliable method by which to document that chiropractic manipulative therapy does affect the ANS by exploring the use of paced breathing as a way to reduce the inherent variability in ANS measurements.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the hypothesis that the variability of ANS measurements would be reduced if breathing were paced to a metronome at 12 breaths/min.

SETTING

The study was performed at Parker College Research Institute. Eight normotensive subjects were recruited from the student body and staff.

METHODS

Respiration frequency was measured through a strain gauge. A 3-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) was used to register the electric activity of the heart, and arterial tonometry monitors were used to record the left and right radial artery blood pressures. Signals were recorded on an IBM-compatible computer with a sampling frequency of 100 Hz. Normal breathing was used for the first 3 recordings, and breathing was paced to a metronome for the final 3 recordings at 12 breaths/min. Fourier analysis was performed on the beat-by-beat fluctuations of the ECG-determined R-R interval and systolic arterial pressure (SBP). Low-frequency fluctuations (LF; 0.04-0.15 Hz) reflected sympathetic activity, whereas high-frequency fluctuations (HF; 0.15-0.4 Hz) represented parasympathetic activity. Sympathovagal indices were determined from the ratio of the two bandwidths (LF/HF). The coefficient of variation (CV%) for autonomic parameters was calculated ([average/SD] x 100%) to compare breathing normally and breathing to a metronome with respect to variability. One-way analysis of variance was used to detect differences. A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant; all results are presented as average +/- SD.

RESULTS

Three male and 5 female normotensive subjects were studied. Metronome breathing did not produce any significant changes in blood pressure for the left and right radial arteries, heart rate, or pressure pulse transmission time. Breathing to a metronome increased ECG-HF power (0.25 +/- 0.07 vs 0.35 +/- 0.09, P < 0.04), decreased ECG-LF/HF (1.08 +/- 0.55 vs 0.57 +/- 0.35, P < 0.05), and reduced the CV% for ECG-LF (47.6% +/- 23.4% vs 23.8% +/- 14.6%, P < 0.03), ECG-HF (46.2% +/- 14.2% vs 25.8% +/- 17.0%, P < 0.03) and ECG-LF/HF (50.1% +/- 27.6% vs 23.4% +/- 12.3%, P < 0.03) in comparison with normal breathing. Metronome breathing increased the left and right radial artery SBP-HF fluctuations (left, 0.11 +/- 0.05 vs 0.30 +/- 0.16, P < 0.007; right, 0.09 +/- 0.05 vs 0.27 +/- 0.15, P < 0.008) and decreased the SBP-LF/HF components (left, 3.42 +/- 2.36 vs 1.14 +/- 0.88, P > 0.03; right, 3.08 +/- 1.77 vs 1.20 +/- 0.93, P < 0.02). Metronome breathing did not significantly alter the CV% for SBP-HF, SBP-LF, and SBP-LF/HF.

CONCLUSIONS

Metronome breathing increased parasympathetic activity, as evidenced by augmented HF power in the ECG and SBP data. The variability (CV%) of ECG-determined ANS measurements was significantly reduced with paced breathing at 12 breaths/min, but no significant reductions were observed for the SBP-determined ANS measurements. These findings indicate that ECG data are more sensitive than SBP data for future clinical trials.

摘要

背景

许多脊椎按摩师假设脊柱推拿会影响自主神经系统(ANS)。然而,自主神经系统对脊椎按摩疗法的反应尚未得到充分记录,需要更多研究来支持这一假设。本研究朝着开发一种可靠方法迈出了一步,该方法通过探索使用节律性呼吸来减少自主神经系统测量中固有的变异性,从而证明脊椎按摩疗法确实会影响自主神经系统。

目的

检验以下假设:如果呼吸按照节拍器以每分钟12次呼吸的频率进行调节,自主神经系统测量的变异性将会降低。

设置

该研究在帕克学院研究所进行。从学生群体和教职员工中招募了8名血压正常的受试者。

方法

通过应变仪测量呼吸频率。使用三导联心电图(ECG)记录心脏的电活动,并使用动脉张力监测仪记录左右桡动脉血压。信号以100Hz的采样频率记录在一台与IBM兼容的计算机上。前3次记录采用正常呼吸,最后3次记录时呼吸按照节拍器以每分钟12次呼吸的频率进行调节。对心电图测定的R-R间期和收缩压(SBP)的逐搏波动进行傅里叶分析。低频波动(LF;0.04-0.15Hz)反映交感神经活动,而高频波动(HF;0.15-0.4Hz)代表副交感神经活动。通过两个带宽的比值(LF/HF)确定交感迷走指数。计算自主神经参数的变异系数(CV%)([平均值/标准差]×100%),以比较正常呼吸和按照节拍器呼吸时的变异性。采用单因素方差分析来检测差异。P<0.05的值被认为具有统计学意义;所有结果均以平均值±标准差表示。

结果

研究了3名男性和5名女性血压正常的受试者。按照节拍器呼吸在左右桡动脉血压、心率或压力脉搏传输时间方面未产生任何显著变化。按照节拍器呼吸增加了心电图高频功率(0.25±0.07对0.35±0.09,P<0.04),降低了心电图低频/高频比值(1.08±0.55对0.57±0.35,P<0.05),并降低了心电图低频(47.6%±23.4%对23.8%±14.6%,P<0.03)、心电图高频(46.2%±14.2%对25.8%±17.0%,P<0.03)和心电图低频/高频(50.1%±27.6%对23.4%±12.3%,P<0.03)的变异系数,与正常呼吸相比。按照节拍器呼吸增加了左右桡动脉收缩压高频波动(左,0.11±0.05对0.30±0.16,P<0.007;右,0.09±0.05对0.27±0.15,P<0.008),并降低了收缩压低频/高频成分(左,3.42±2.36对1.14±0.88,P>0.03;右,3.08±1.77对1.20±0.93,P<0.02)。按照节拍器呼吸在收缩压高频、收缩压低频和收缩压低频/高频的变异系数方面未产生显著改变。

结论

按照节拍器呼吸增加了副交感神经活动,心电图和收缩压数据中高频功率增加证明了这一点。以每分钟12次呼吸的频率进行节律性呼吸时,心电图测定的自主神经系统测量的变异性(CV%)显著降低,但收缩压测定的自主神经系统测量未观察到显著降低。这些发现表明,在未来的临床试验中,心电图数据比收缩压数据更敏感。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验