• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全国性调查能否成功地从当地国民保健服务资源中获得资金支持?来自临终关怀区域研究的证据。

Can national surveys be funded successfully from local NHS resources? Evidence from the Regional Study of Care for the Dying.

作者信息

Addington-Hall J, McCarthy M

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College, London.

出版信息

J Public Health Med. 1995 Jun;17(2):161-3. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a043087.

DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a043087
PMID:7576798
Abstract

In the current economic climate, obtaining funding for large-scale national health services research surveys can be very difficult. In this paper we describe how the funding for a national survey, in which a random sample of 3696 bereaved relatives were interviewed, was obtained through collaboration with health regions and districts, and we consider the advantages and disadvantages of this approach. Although researchers considering using joint funding with the NHS may have to make compromises between ideal study design and what is feasible given local needs and the geographical spread of participating districts or NHS units, we conclude that collaboration can benefit both parties.

摘要

在当前的经济形势下,为大规模的国家卫生服务研究调查获取资金可能非常困难。在本文中,我们描述了一项全国性调查的资金是如何通过与卫生区域和地区合作获得的,该调查对3696名失去亲人的亲属进行了随机抽样访谈,我们还考虑了这种方法的优缺点。尽管考虑与国民健康服务体系(NHS)联合资助的研究人员可能不得不在理想的研究设计与根据当地需求以及参与地区或NHS单位的地理分布情况可行的方案之间做出妥协,但我们得出结论,合作对双方都有益。

相似文献

1
Can national surveys be funded successfully from local NHS resources? Evidence from the Regional Study of Care for the Dying.全国性调查能否成功地从当地国民保健服务资源中获得资金支持?来自临终关怀区域研究的证据。
J Public Health Med. 1995 Jun;17(2):161-3. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a043087.
2
Cutting the cake: allocation of NHS research and development funding.瓜分蛋糕:英国国家医疗服务体系研发资金的分配
Br J Gen Pract. 2005 Nov;55(520):827-8.
3
Quality research in healthcare: are researchers getting enough statistical support?医疗保健领域的高质量研究:研究人员是否获得了足够的统计支持?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Jan 12;6:2. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-2.
4
Assessing payback from NHS reactive research programmes.评估英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)反应性研究项目的回报。
J Manag Med. 2000;14(1):25-36. doi: 10.1108/02689230010340363.
5
Capitation funding: population, age, and mortality adjustments for regional and district health authorities in England.按人头计费资金:针对英格兰地区和地方卫生当局的人口、年龄及死亡率调整
BMJ. 1993 Oct 30;307(6912):1121-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6912.1121.
6
Evaluating the NHS research and development programme: will the programme give value for money?评估英国国家医疗服务体系的研发项目:该项目是否物有所值?
J R Soc Med. 1998;91 Suppl 35(Suppl 35):2-6. doi: 10.1177/014107689809135S02.
7
The Cooksey review of UK health research funding.库克西对英国健康研究资金的审查。
BMJ. 2006 Dec 16;333(7581):1231-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39059.444120.80.
8
Funding research in primary care: is Culyer the remedy?为初级医疗保健研究提供资金:库利尔是解决之道吗?
Br J Gen Pract. 1997 Sep;47(422):543-4.
9
Economic appraisal in the British National Health Service: implications of recent developments.英国国民医疗服务体系中的经济评估:近期发展的影响
Soc Sci Med. 1994 Jun;38(12):1615-23. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90062-0.
10
A national study of state-supported psychiatric research institutes.
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1989 Apr;40(4):388-92. doi: 10.1176/ps.40.4.388.

引用本文的文献

1
Dying from heart disease.死于心脏病。
J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1996 Jul-Aug;30(4):325-8.