Feerick A E, Church J A, Zwischenberger J, Conti V, Johnston W E
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston 77555-0591, USA.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1995 Aug;9(4):395-8. doi: 10.1016/s1053-0770(05)80093-x.
Gaseous microemboli during cardiac surgery have been implicated as a potential cause of postoperative neurologic injury. Any monitoring technique that exposes the systemic circulation to atmospheric pressure could introduce gaseous microemboli, causing cerebral microembolization. The incidence of carotid artery gaseous microemboli was studied during left atrial catheter insertion.
Prospective clinical study.
Tertiary care university hospital.
Twelve patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery.
Perioperatively, a 5-MHz continuous wave Doppler probe was positioned over the left carotid artery to maximally record blood flow signals. The criteria used for detecting a gaseous microembolus were a sudden increase in the amplitude of the visual signal by 30% and a characteristic audible sound.
Numbers of microemboli at three timepoints (before and during left atrial catheter insertion and during catheter flushing) were assessed using the Friedman test. No emboli were detected before left atrial catheter insertion. When compared with the preinsertion time period, statistically (p < 0.05) significant numbers of gaseous microemboli were found in six patients during catheter insertion (3 +/- 1 microemboli; range 1 to 7 microemboli) and in five patients during catheter flushing (5 +/- 2 microemboli; range 1 to 12 microemboli). There was a tendency for patients with lower filling pressures to entrain more microemboli during insertion (r = 0.44; p = 0.149). No patient showed evidence of gross neurologic dysfunction postoperatively, although sensitive neurologic testing was not performed.
Left atrial catheter insertion and flushing can cause systemic gaseous microemboli in more than 50% of patients. Although the number of microemboli introduced is relatively small, extreme care should be used during left atrial catheter insertion.
心脏手术期间的气态微栓子被认为是术后神经损伤的潜在原因。任何使体循环暴露于大气压的监测技术都可能引入气态微栓子,导致脑微栓塞。本研究旨在观察左心房导管插入过程中颈动脉气态微栓子的发生率。
前瞻性临床研究。
三级医疗大学医院。
12例接受择期心脏手术的患者。
围手术期,将一个5兆赫的连续波多普勒探头置于左颈动脉上方,以最大程度地记录血流信号。检测气态微栓子的标准为视觉信号幅度突然增加30%以及出现特征性可听声音。
使用Friedman检验评估三个时间点(左心房导管插入前、插入期间和导管冲洗期间)的微栓子数量。左心房导管插入前未检测到栓子。与插入前时间段相比,在导管插入期间,6例患者出现了具有统计学意义(p < 0.05)的大量气态微栓子(3±1个微栓子;范围为1至7个微栓子),5例患者在导管冲洗期间出现大量气态微栓子(5±2个微栓子;范围为1至12个微栓子)。充盈压较低的患者在插入过程中倾向于夹带更多微栓子(r = 0.44;p = 0.149)。尽管未进行敏感的神经功能测试,但术后没有患者出现明显的神经功能障碍迹象。
左心房导管插入和冲洗可导致超过50%的患者出现体循环气态微栓子。尽管引入的微栓子数量相对较少,但在左心房导管插入过程中仍应格外小心。