Somu N, Swaminathan S, Paramasivan C N, Vijayasekaran D, Chandrabhooshanam A, Vijayan V K, Prabhakar R
Department of Pediatric Pulmonology, Institute of Child Health and Hospital for Children, Egmore, Madras, India.
Tuber Lung Dis. 1995 Aug;76(4):295-9. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8479(05)80027-9.
The aim of our study was to find out if bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) would be better than gastric lavage for the isolation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from pediatric patients with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis.
50 children with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis at a mean age of 5.1 years (range 7 months to 12 years) were studied. Early morning gastric lavage was collected. Flexible bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage was performed under local anaesthesia after obtaining informed consent from the parents. The BAL fluid and gastric lavage specimens were subjected to smear examination for acid-fast bacilli (AFB) and culture for mycobacteria using established methods.
Of the 50 cases, M. tuberculosis was grown in 6 BAL samples (12%) and 16 gastric lavage samples (32%) making a total of 17 culture proven cases (34%). Out of the 6 BAL positive cases, gastric lavage was also positive in 5 cases.
We conclude that gastric lavage is better than BAL for bacteriologic confirmation of pulmonary tuberculosis in children. The overall bacteriologic yield combining both procedures was 34% while gastric lavage alone was positive in 32% of the cases.
我们研究的目的是确定对于疑似肺结核的儿科患者,支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)在分离结核分枝杆菌方面是否优于洗胃。
对50名疑似肺结核的儿童进行了研究,平均年龄为5.1岁(范围7个月至12岁)。收集清晨洗胃样本。在获得家长知情同意后,在局部麻醉下进行了可弯曲支气管镜检查和支气管肺泡灌洗。使用既定方法对BAL液和洗胃样本进行抗酸杆菌(AFB)涂片检查和分枝杆菌培养。
在50例病例中,6份BAL样本(12%)和16份洗胃样本(32%)培养出结核分枝杆菌,共17例培养确诊病例(34%)。在6例BAL阳性病例中,5例洗胃样本也呈阳性。
我们得出结论,对于儿童肺结核的细菌学确诊,洗胃优于BAL。两种方法结合的总体细菌学检出率为34%,而仅洗胃的阳性率为32%。