• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关系障碍的分类与诊断模型。家庭委员会,精神病学促进小组。

A model for the classification and diagnosis of relational disorders. Committee on the Family, Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry.

出版信息

Psychiatr Serv. 1995 Sep;46(9):926-31. doi: 10.1176/ps.46.9.926.

DOI:10.1176/ps.46.9.926
PMID:7583505
Abstract

Important and common relational conditions, such as severe couple dysfunction and family violence involving child or elder abuse, have been omitted from DSM-IV, the authors believe. They argue that such conditions can exist independently of severe individual psychopathology and that these conditions should be described in relational terms, with specific diagnostic criteria. They outline a classification of relational disorders and propose its addition to axis I of DSM-IV. This classification scheme focuses on severe family dysfunction; problems of living usually treated by couple and family therapists are intentionally omitted. Descriptions of two relational disorders, written in DSM style, are provided. The authors discuss implications for the treatment and rehabilitation of patients, the future training of psychiatrists, and the direction of research.

摘要

作者认为,一些重要且常见的关系状况,如严重的夫妻功能障碍以及涉及虐待儿童或老人的家庭暴力,已被排除在《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)之外。他们指出,这些状况能够独立于严重的个体精神病理学存在,并且应以关系术语来描述,同时具备特定的诊断标准。他们概述了关系障碍的分类,并提议将其添加到DSM-IV的第一轴。该分类方案聚焦于严重的家庭功能障碍;通常由夫妻和家庭治疗师处理的生活问题被有意排除。文中提供了两种按照DSM风格撰写的关系障碍描述。作者探讨了对患者治疗与康复、精神科医生未来培训以及研究方向的影响。

相似文献

1
A model for the classification and diagnosis of relational disorders. Committee on the Family, Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry.关系障碍的分类与诊断模型。家庭委员会,精神病学促进小组。
Psychiatr Serv. 1995 Sep;46(9):926-31. doi: 10.1176/ps.46.9.926.
2
Describing relationship problems in DSM-V: toward better guidance for research and clinical practice.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版中对关系问题的描述:为研究和临床实践提供更好的指导。
J Fam Psychol. 2006 Sep;20(3):359-68. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.20.3.359.
3
The challenge of relational diagnoses: applying the biopsychosocial model in DSM-IV. Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry Committee on the Family.关系诊断的挑战:在《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版中应用生物心理社会模型。促进精神病学发展小组家庭委员会。
Am J Psychiatry. 1989 Nov;146(11):1492-4. doi: 10.1176/ajp.146.11.1492.
4
Relational diagnosis: an idea whose time has come?关系诊断:一个时机已到的理念?
Fam Process. 1993 Jun;32(2):255-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1993.00255.x.
5
Relational diagnosis--a brief historical overview: comment on the special section.关系诊断——简要历史概述:对专题部分的评论
J Fam Psychol. 2006 Sep;20(3):428-31. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.20.3.428.
6
Global Assessment of Relational Functioning scale (GARF): I. Background and rationale. Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry Committee on the Family.关系功能全球评估量表(GARF):一、背景与基本原理。精神病学促进协会家庭委员会。
Fam Process. 1996 Jun;35(2):155-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1996.00155.x.
7
[The importance of classifications in psychiatry].[分类在精神病学中的重要性]
Encephale. 1995 Dec;21 Spec No 5:3-7.
8
[Critical evaluation of the first draft of DSM-V].[《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版初稿的批判性评估]
Rev Med Suisse. 2011 Feb 16;7(282):398, 400-1.
9
Child psychiatrists' views of DSM-III-R: a survey of usage and opinions.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1991 Jul;30(4):652-8. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199107000-00019.
10
Diagnosing DSM-IV--Part I: DSM-IV and the concept of disorder.诊断《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版——第一部分:《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版与疾病概念
Behav Res Ther. 1997 Jul;35(7):633-49. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(97)00018-1.

引用本文的文献

1
A Diagnosis of Denial: How Mental Health Classification Systems Have Struggled to Recognise Family Violence as a Serious Risk Factor in the Development of Mental Health Issues for Infants, Children, Adolescents and Adults.一种否认的诊断:心理健康分类系统如何难以将家庭暴力视为婴儿、儿童、青少年和成年人心理健康问题发展中的严重风险因素。
Brain Sci. 2017 Oct 17;7(10):133. doi: 10.3390/brainsci7100133.