Lawrence K J, Cozolino L, Foy D W
Fuller Graduate School of Psychology, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Child Abuse Negl. 1995 Aug;19(8):975-84. doi: 10.1016/0145-2134(95)00059-h.
The present study sought to increase current scientific knowledge about the controversial issue of subjectively reported childhood ritualistic abuse by addressing several key unresolved issues. In particular, the possibility that those reporting ritualistic abuse may be characterized primarily by the severity of their abuse histories or the severity of their present psychological symptoms, rather than the veridicality of the ritualistic events, was explored. Adult female outpatients reporting childhood sexual abuse with ritualistic features were compared with a second group of women who reported childhood sexual abuse without ritualism. Measures included characteristics of childhood sexual and physical abuse, current posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) diagnostic status and symptom severity, and severity of current dissociative experiences. Women reporting ritualistic features scored significantly higher on measures of childhood sexual and physical abuse. Neither PTSD diagnostic status nor severity for PTSD nor dissociative experiences were significantly different between the groups. While preliminary in nature, these results suggest that it may be helpful to conceptualize reported childhood ritualistic abuse as indicative of the need to assess carefully for severe abuse and its predictable sequelae within existing traumatic victimization conceptual frameworks.
本研究旨在通过解决几个关键的未解决问题,增加当前关于主观报告的童年仪式性虐待这一争议性问题的科学知识。特别是,探讨了那些报告仪式性虐待的人可能主要以其虐待史的严重程度或当前心理症状的严重程度为特征,而不是以仪式性事件的真实性为特征的可能性。将报告有仪式性特征的童年性虐待的成年女性门诊患者与另一组报告无仪式性童年性虐待的女性进行了比较。测量指标包括童年性虐待和身体虐待的特征、当前创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的诊断状况和症状严重程度,以及当前解离体验的严重程度。报告有仪式性特征的女性在童年性虐待和身体虐待的测量指标上得分显著更高。两组之间的PTSD诊断状况、PTSD严重程度或解离体验均无显著差异。虽然这些结果本质上是初步的,但它们表明,将报告的童年仪式性虐待概念化为表明需要在现有的创伤受害概念框架内仔细评估严重虐待及其可预测的后果,可能会有所帮助。