Flynn S D, Kinder B K
Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Curr Opin Gen Surg. 1993:115-20.
Differential diagnosis of endocrine neoplasms as benign or malignant is frequently extremely difficult. Similarly, assessing prognosis in cases of malignancy is problematic. Traditionally, histologic criteria, including grade of the tumor, architectural features, and cytologic appearance, have been used to predict biologic behavior. In addition, clinical scoring systems may be useful in assigning prognosis in individual cases. Examination of the DNA profile of individual cells by flow cytometry may correlate with the aggressiveness of the tumor. Recent developments in molecular genetics have yielded genetic markers that may be useful in diagnosis and prognosis as well as illuminating the pathogenesis of endocrine neoplasia. This review summarizes the status of traditional and newer methods of pathologic interpretation of endocrine neoplasms. In general, the most accurate assessment of these tumors is derived from consideration of a collage of the clinical and pathologic criteria discussed herein.
鉴别内分泌肿瘤是良性还是恶性通常极为困难。同样,评估恶性肿瘤病例的预后也存在问题。传统上,组织学标准,包括肿瘤分级、结构特征和细胞学表现,已被用于预测生物学行为。此外,临床评分系统可能有助于个别病例的预后评估。通过流式细胞术检测单个细胞的DNA谱可能与肿瘤的侵袭性相关。分子遗传学的最新进展产生了一些基因标志物,这些标志物可能在诊断、预后评估以及阐明内分泌肿瘤的发病机制方面都有用处。本综述总结了内分泌肿瘤病理诊断的传统方法和新方法的现状。一般来说,对这些肿瘤最准确的评估来自于综合考虑本文讨论的临床和病理标准。