Suppr超能文献

数字式双嘧达莫负荷超声心动图与直立位踏车负荷超声心动图用于识别冠状动脉狭窄的比较。

Comparison of digital dipyridamole stress echocardiography and upright bicycle stress echocardiography for identification of coronary artery stenosis.

作者信息

Bjørnstad K, Aakhus S, Hatle L

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University Hospital of Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

Cardiology. 1995;86(6):514-20. doi: 10.1159/000176932.

Abstract

This study compared the diagnostic accuracy of dipyridamole (0.84 mg i.v./10 min) and bicycle stress echocardiography in 37 patients with inconclusive standard bicycle electrocardiography (ECG) tests; all underwent coronary angiography. Sensitivity for detection of coronary stenosis with dipyridamole echocardiography was 68% (21 of 31 patients), and for 1-, 2- and 3-vessel disease 56, 69 and 83%, respectively. Overall bicycle echocardiography sensitivity was 84%, and 78, 88 and 83% for patients with 1-, 2- and 3-vessel disease, respectively. Dipyridamole echocardiography was negative in all 6 patients with negative coronary angiography (specificity 100%), bicycle echocardiography was positive in 2 (specificity 67%). We conclude that dipyridamole echocardiography tends to be less sensitive in patients with mild disease, but is more specific than bicycle echocardiography.

摘要

本研究比较了双嘧达莫(静脉注射0.84mg/10分钟)和踏车运动负荷超声心动图对37例标准踏车心电图(ECG)检查结果不明确的患者的诊断准确性;所有患者均接受了冠状动脉造影。双嘧达莫负荷超声心动图检测冠状动脉狭窄的敏感性为68%(31例患者中的21例),对于单支、双支和三支血管病变的敏感性分别为56%、69%和83%。总体而言,踏车运动负荷超声心动图的敏感性为84%,对于单支、双支和三支血管病变患者的敏感性分别为78%、88%和83%。6例冠状动脉造影阴性的患者双嘧达莫负荷超声心动图均为阴性(特异性100%),2例踏车运动负荷超声心动图为阳性(特异性67%)。我们得出结论,双嘧达莫负荷超声心动图对轻度病变患者的敏感性往往较低,但比踏车运动负荷超声心动图更具特异性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验