Schulz R, Wambolt R
Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Cardiovasc Res. 1995 Sep;30(3):432-9.
Nitric oxide (NO) exerts both protective and detrimental actions in a variety of biological systems. During acute reperfusion following myocardial ischaemia, a rapid overproduction of free radicals, including NO, may occur. We investigated the effects of the NO synthase inhibitors NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) and NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA), and the substrate for NO synthesis, L-arginine, on heart function during ischaemia and reperfusion injury.
Spontaneously beating, isolated working rabbit hearts, perfused with modified Krebs-Henseleit buffer containing 1.2 mM palmitate bound to 3% bovine serum albumin, were subjected to 15 min of aerobic perfusion followed by 35 min of global, no-flow ischaemia and 30 min of aerobic reperfusion.
Throughout the reperfusion period there was a marked impairment in the recovery of mechanical function, measured as the product of heart rate x peak systolic pressure (rate-pressure product). Addition of L-NAME (3 microM) prior to the onset of ischaemia, but not at reperfusion, caused an immediate and significant increase in the recovery of mechanical function throughout the reperfusion period. The protective action of L-NAME was abolished by L- (but not D-) arginine (100 microM). L-NAME did not cause ischaemia as it did not alter glycogen or lactate content of aerobically perfused hearts. Furthermore, it did not prevent glycogen loss or lactate accumulation during 35 min of ischaemia, suggesting that the effects of L-NAME were not due to metabolic alterations during ischaemia itself. L-NMMA (30 microM) added prior to ischaemia, but not at reperfusion, also had a protective effect which was seen later in the reperfusion period. Addition of L- (but not D-) arginine (100 microM) prior to the onset of ischaemia resulted in an improved recovery of mechanical function only at 15 min of reperfusion.
These results suggest that: (1) the recovery of mechanical function of hearts subjected to ischaemia-reperfusion injury can be improved by modulation of myocardial NO synthesis, (2) inhibition of NO synthesis (with L-NAME or L-NMMA) may offer prolonged protection whereas its stimulation (with L-arginine) provides only brief protection, and (3) the reasons for the pharmacological effectiveness of these divergent strategies may be due to the formation of peroxynitrite from NO and superoxide anion during reperfusion.
一氧化氮(NO)在多种生物系统中发挥着保护和有害作用。在心肌缺血后的急性再灌注期间,可能会迅速产生包括NO在内的自由基。我们研究了NO合酶抑制剂NG-硝基-L-精氨酸甲酯(L-NAME)和NG-单甲基-L-精氨酸(L-NMMA)以及NO合成底物L-精氨酸在缺血和再灌注损伤期间对心脏功能的影响。
将自发搏动的离体工作兔心脏用含有与3%牛血清白蛋白结合的1.2 mM棕榈酸酯的改良Krebs-Henseleit缓冲液灌注,先进行15分钟的有氧灌注,然后进行35分钟的全心无血流缺血和30分钟的有氧再灌注。
在整个再灌注期间,以心率×收缩压峰值(速率-压力乘积)衡量的机械功能恢复存在明显损害。在缺血开始前而非再灌注时添加L-NAME(3 microM),可使整个再灌注期间的机械功能恢复立即且显著增加。L-(而非D-)精氨酸(100 microM)可消除L-NAME的保护作用。L-NAME不会导致缺血,因为它不会改变有氧灌注心脏的糖原或乳酸含量。此外,它不会阻止缺血35分钟期间的糖原损失或乳酸积累,这表明L-NAME的作用并非由于缺血本身的代谢改变。在缺血开始前而非再灌注时添加L-NMMA(30 microM)也有保护作用,且在再灌注后期出现。在缺血开始前添加L-(而非D-)精氨酸(100 microM)仅在再灌注15分钟时可改善机械功能恢复。
这些结果表明:(1)通过调节心肌NO合成可改善遭受缺血-再灌注损伤心脏的机械功能恢复;(2)抑制NO合成(使用L-NAME或L-NMMA)可能提供长期保护,而刺激其合成(使用L-精氨酸)仅提供短暂保护;(3)这些不同策略的药理有效性的原因可能是由于再灌注期间NO与超氧阴离子形成过氧亚硝酸盐。