• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在一项对照临床试验期间,多种抗癫痫药物的给药频率和给药间隔依从性。

Dose frequency and dose interval compliance with multiple antiepileptic medications during a controlled clinical trial.

作者信息

Cramer J, Vachon L, Desforges C, Sussman N M

机构信息

Health Services Research, VA Medical Center, West Haven, Connecticut 06516, USA.

出版信息

Epilepsia. 1995 Nov;36(11):1111-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1995.tb00469.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1528-1157.1995.tb00469.x
PMID:7588455
Abstract

Compliance with medication regimens and clinical trial schedules was evaluated during a study of vigabatrin (VGB), an antiepileptic drug (AED). Medication Event Monitors (MEMS, Aprex Corp., Fremont, CA, U.S.A.) were provided to monitor use of VGB and other AEDs administered to 111 patients at 10 sites. MEMS reports showed the number of doses administered daily, times of doses, and intervals between doses. The 66 patients whose data were evaluable took VGB as prescribed (twice daily, b.i.d.) on 89 +/- 7% of days in the clinical trial (mean 189 +/- 63 days). However, only 66 +/- 24% of doses were taken within the 9-15-h dose interval window for twice-daily dosing, a lower rate than that for dose frequency compliance (p < 0.001). Concomitant medications prescribed b.i.d. (n = 66) (86 +/- 11% dose frequency compliance) were taken at lower rates than VGB (p < 0.02). Interval compliance also was lower for concomitant b.i.d. medications (59 +/- 26%) than for VGB (p < 0.01). Dose frequency compliance for thrice-daily (t.i.d.) medications (n = 36) was 80 +/- 18 and 40 +/- 19% for interval compliance (6-10 h) (both p < 0.0001 vs. VGB). Dose frequency compliance for four times daily (q.i.d.) medications (n = 23) was 80 +/- 23 and 33 +/- 18% for interval compliance (4-8 h) (both p < 0.0001 vs. VGB). Patients at eight sites did not use MEMS properly, often for practical reasons, voiding including of data for 93 medications (32%) because of noncompliance with the study design to monitor compliance.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

在一项关于抗癫痫药物(AED)氨己烯酸(VGB)的研究中,对药物治疗方案和临床试验时间表的依从性进行了评估。提供了药物事件监测器(MEMS,美国加利福尼亚州弗里蒙特市Aprex公司),以监测10个地点111例患者使用VGB和其他AED的情况。MEMS报告显示了每日给药剂量数、给药时间和给药间隔。66例可评估数据的患者在临床试验中89±7%的天数按规定服用VGB(每日两次,bid)(平均189±63天)。然而,对于每日两次给药,仅66±24%的剂量在9至15小时的给药间隔窗口内服用,这一比例低于给药频率依从性(p<0.001)。每日两次给药的伴随药物(n=66)(给药频率依从性为86±11%)的服用率低于VGB(p<0.02)。每日两次给药的伴随药物的间隔依从性(59±26%)也低于VGB(p<0.01)。每日三次(tid)给药的药物(n=36)的给药频率依从性为80±18%,间隔依从性(6至10小时)为40±19%(两者与VGB相比,p<0.0001)。每日四次(qid)给药的药物(n=23)的给药频率依从性为80±23%,间隔依从性(4至8小时)为33±18%(两者与VGB相比,p<0.0001)。八个地点的患者未正确使用MEMS,通常是出于实际原因,由于不符合监测依从性的研究设计,93种药物(32%)的数据无效。(摘要截取自250字)

相似文献

1
Dose frequency and dose interval compliance with multiple antiepileptic medications during a controlled clinical trial.在一项对照临床试验期间,多种抗癫痫药物的给药频率和给药间隔依从性。
Epilepsia. 1995 Nov;36(11):1111-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1995.tb00469.x.
2
Acute effects of vigabatrin on brain GABA and homocarnosine in patients with complex partial seizures.氨己烯酸对复杂部分性癫痫患者脑内γ-氨基丁酸和高肌肽的急性影响。
Epilepsia. 1999 Jul;40(7):958-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1999.tb00803.x.
3
Gamma-vinyl GABA (vigabatrin) and mood disturbances.γ-乙烯基γ-氨基丁酸(vigabatrin)与情绪障碍
Epilepsia. 1994 Sep-Oct;35(5):999-1004. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1994.tb02545.x.
4
Dose-Response Study of Vigabatrin as add-on therapy in patients with uncontrolled complex partial seizures.
Epilepsia. 1999 Jan;40(1):74-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1999.tb01991.x.
5
Vigabatrin serum concentration to dosage ratio: influence of age and associated antiepileptic drugs.氨己烯酸血清浓度与剂量比:年龄及相关抗癫痫药物的影响
Ther Drug Monit. 1997 Oct;19(5):491-8. doi: 10.1097/00007691-199710000-00001.
6
The effect of vigabatrin (gamma-vinyl GABA) on cerebral blood flow and metabolism.氨己烯酸(γ-乙烯基γ-氨基丁酸)对脑血流量和代谢的影响。
Neurology. 1999 Oct 22;53(7):1518-22. doi: 10.1212/wnl.53.7.1518.
7
Vigabatrin vs. carbamazepine monotherapy in newly diagnosed focal epilepsy: a randomized response conditional cross-over study.
Epilepsy Res. 1996 Nov;25(3):257-62. doi: 10.1016/s0920-1211(96)00074-5.
8
Visual field loss associated with vigabatrin: quantification and relation to dosage.与vigabatrin相关的视野缺损:量化及其与剂量的关系。
Epilepsia. 2001 Feb;42(2):262-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1528-1157.2001.15000.x.
9
Gamma-vinyl-GABA (vigabatrin) in the therapy of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: an open study.
Epilepsia. 1994 Sep-Oct;35(5):993-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1994.tb02544.x.
10
Once-daily versus twice-daily vigabatrin: is there a difference? The results of a double-blind pilot study.
Epilepsia. 1999 Mar;40(3):311-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1999.tb00710.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of behavioral economics to improve antihypertensive therapy adherence, a pilot randomized controlled trial in Los Angeles.
Sci Rep. 2025 Nov 4;15(1):38452. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94805-5.
2
Phase III study of bilayer sustained-release tramadol tablets in patients with cancer pain: a double-blind parallel-group, non-inferiority study with immediate-release tramadol capsules as an active comparator.三期临床试验:双相缓释曲马多片治疗癌症疼痛的疗效——以速释曲马多胶囊为阳性对照的平行组双盲非劣效性研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Dec 29;32(1):69. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-08242-z.
3
Incentives and Reminders to Improve Long-term Medication Adherence (INMIND): Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.改善长期药物依从性的激励与提醒措施(INMIND):一项试点随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Oct 31;11(10):e42216. doi: 10.2196/42216.
4
Strategies for improving adherence to antiepileptic drug treatment in people with epilepsy.提高癫痫患者抗癫痫药物治疗依从性的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 22;10(10):CD008312. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008312.pub4.
5
Behavioral Economics Incentives to Support HIV Treatment Adherence (BEST): Protocol for a randomized controlled trial in Uganda.行为经济学激励支持艾滋病毒治疗依从性(BEST):乌干达一项随机对照试验的方案。
Trials. 2020 Jan 3;21(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3795-4.
6
Text Messaging for Improving Antiretroviral Therapy Adherence: No Effects After 1 Year in a Randomized Controlled Trial Among Adolescents and Young Adults.短信干预改善抗逆转录病毒治疗依从性:一项针对青少年和青年成年人的随机对照试验1年后无效果
Am J Public Health. 2017 Dec;107(12):1944-1950. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304089. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
7
Can Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison Methods Mitigate Placebo Response Differences Among Patient Populations in Adjunctive Trials of Brivaracetam and Levetiracetam?匹配调整间接比较方法能否减轻布瓦西坦和左乙拉西坦辅助治疗试验中患者人群间安慰剂反应的差异?
CNS Drugs. 2017 Oct;31(10):899-910. doi: 10.1007/s40263-017-0462-8.
8
Strategies for improving adherence to antiepileptic drug treatment in people with epilepsy.提高癫痫患者抗癫痫药物治疗依从性的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 3;2(2):CD008312. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008312.pub3.
9
Difficulties in Treatment and Management of Epilepsy and Challenges in New Drug Development.癫痫治疗与管理中的困难以及新药研发面临的挑战
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2010 Jul 5;3(7):2090-2110. doi: 10.3390/ph3072090.
10
Assessing bioequivalence of generic modified-release antiepileptic drugs.评估仿制缓释抗癫痫药物的生物等效性。
Neurology. 2016 Apr 26;86(17):1597-604. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002607. Epub 2016 Mar 25.