Schudt C, Tenor H, Hatzelmann A
Dept of Biochemistry, Byk Gulden, Konstanz, Germany.
Eur Respir J. 1995 Jul;8(7):1179-83. doi: 10.1183/09031936.95.08071179.
Phophodiesterase (PDE) isoenzyme profiles of human cell preparations and tissues have been analysed by a semiquantitative method using selective PDE inhibitors and activators. Neutrophils, eosinophils and monocytes contain PDE IV exclusively. Lymphocytes, alveolar macrophages and endothelial cells contain PDE IV and PDE III, and in addition, PDE I is measured in macrophages and PDE II in endothelial cells. These basal cell-specific PDE isoenzyme profiles appear to be modified by: 1) substrate concentration; 2) kinase-dependent phosphorylation; and 3) regulated rate of synthesis. Therefore, PDE isoenzyme profiles represent dynamic patterns, which apparently adapt to pathological and environmental conditions. In parallel functional studies, the influence of mono-selective (rolipram, PDE IV; motapizone, PDE III), dual-selective (zardaverine) and non-selective (theophylline) PDE inhibitors were compared. Corresponding to isoenzyme analysis, it was demonstrated that both PDE III and PDE IV have to be inhibited for complete suppression of either tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) release from macrophages, or lymphocyte proliferation (PDE III/IV cells). In eosinophils (PDE IV cells) platelet-activating factor (PAF)-induced chemotaxis or C5a-stimulated degranulation are only weakly inhibited by rolipram alone. After addition of a beta 2-agonist, however, the efficacy of rolipram is enhanced due to concomitant influence of synthesis and breakdown of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP). Theophylline inhibits PDE isoenzyme activities and functions of inflammatory cells with similar potency, and exhibits higher functional efficacy as compared to rolipram.
已通过使用选择性磷酸二酯酶(PDE)抑制剂和激活剂的半定量方法,分析了人细胞制剂和组织中的PDE同工酶谱。中性粒细胞、嗜酸性粒细胞和单核细胞仅含有PDE IV。淋巴细胞、肺泡巨噬细胞和内皮细胞含有PDE IV和PDE III,此外,巨噬细胞中可检测到PDE I,内皮细胞中可检测到PDE II。这些基础细胞特异性PDE同工酶谱似乎会受到以下因素的影响:1)底物浓度;2)激酶依赖性磷酸化;3)合成调节速率。因此,PDE同工酶谱代表动态模式,显然可适应病理和环境条件。在平行的功能研究中,比较了单选择性(咯利普兰,PDE IV;莫他比宗,PDE III)、双选择性(扎达维林)和非选择性(茶碱)PDE抑制剂的影响。与同工酶分析一致,结果表明,为了完全抑制巨噬细胞释放肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)或淋巴细胞增殖(PDE III/IV细胞),必须同时抑制PDE III和PDE IV。在嗜酸性粒细胞(PDE IV细胞)中,咯利普兰单独使用时,对血小板活化因子(PAF)诱导的趋化作用或C5a刺激的脱颗粒作用仅有微弱抑制。然而,加入β2激动剂后,由于环磷酸腺苷(cAMP)合成和分解的协同影响,咯利普兰的疗效增强。茶碱对PDE同工酶活性和炎症细胞功能的抑制作用效力相似,与咯利普兰相比,其功能疗效更高。