• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改良根治性子宫切除术:发病率和死亡率

Modified radical hysterectomy: morbidity and mortality.

作者信息

Magrina J F, Goodrich M A, Weaver A L, Podratz K C

机构信息

Department of Gynecology, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Arizona 85259, USA.

出版信息

Gynecol Oncol. 1995 Nov;59(2):277-82. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1995.0022.

DOI:10.1006/gyno.1995.0022
PMID:7590487
Abstract

Among 375 patients who underwent a modified radical hysterectomy at the Mayo Clinic, the complication rate was 24%, and the operative mortality was 0.5%. When compared with radical hysterectomy, this procedure is associated with a lower overall incidence of complications, particularly those related to the urinary tract.

摘要

在梅奥诊所接受改良根治性子宫切除术的375例患者中,并发症发生率为24%,手术死亡率为0.5%。与根治性子宫切除术相比,该手术的总体并发症发生率较低,尤其是与泌尿系统相关的并发症。

相似文献

1
Modified radical hysterectomy: morbidity and mortality.改良根治性子宫切除术:发病率和死亡率
Gynecol Oncol. 1995 Nov;59(2):277-82. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1995.0022.
2
[Analysis of postoperative complications of radical hysterectomy for 219 cervical cancer patients].219例宫颈癌患者根治性子宫切除术后并发症分析
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2006 Apr;28(4):316-9.
3
Hysterectomy for gynaecological cancer: a follow-up study of subjective and objective outcome.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004 Jun;44(3):214-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2004.00213.x.
4
Radical hysterectomy morbidity in relation to age.根治性子宫切除术的发病率与年龄的关系。
Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Jul;78(1):77-9.
5
Surgical stapling technique for radical hysterectomy: survival, recurrence, and late complications.根治性子宫切除术的外科吻合技术:生存率、复发率及晚期并发症
Gynecol Oncol. 2000 Nov;79(2):281-3. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2000.5948.
6
A comparison of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy outcomes.腹腔镜次全子宫切除术与经腹全子宫切除术效果的比较。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005 Mar-Apr;12(2):121-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2005.01.019.
7
Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy vs. radical abdominal hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a match controlled study.腹腔镜辅助根治性阴道子宫切除术与根治性腹式子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌的匹配对照研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 2004 Dec;95(3):655-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.07.055.
8
Comparison of total laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer.早期宫颈癌患者全腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术与腹式根治性子宫切除术的比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jul;110(1):96-102. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000268798.75353.04.
9
Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy using pulsed bipolar system: comparison with conventional bipolar electrosurgery.使用脉冲双极系统的腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术:与传统双极电外科手术的比较。
Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Jun;105(3):620-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.01.029. Epub 2007 Feb 15.
10
[The Wertheim-Meigs radical hysterectomy in surgical treatment of cervical carcinoma].[ Wertheim-Meigs根治性子宫切除术在宫颈癌手术治疗中的应用]
Med Pregl. 2001 Sep-Oct;54(9-10):465-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Radical Hysterectomy in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: Abandoning the One-Fits-All Concept.早期宫颈癌根治性子宫切除术:摒弃“一刀切”理念。
J Pers Med. 2023 Aug 24;13(9):1292. doi: 10.3390/jpm13091292.
2
Comparison of Oncologic Outcomes between Radical Hysterectomy and Primary Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Women with Bulky IB and IIA Cervical Cancer under Risk Stratification.风险分层下,IB期和IIA期巨块型宫颈癌患者行根治性子宫切除术与同期放化疗的肿瘤学结局比较
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jun 2;15(11):3034. doi: 10.3390/cancers15113034.
3
Abdominal type B vs. type C radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A matched single center cohort report.
早期宫颈癌腹式B型与C型根治性子宫切除术:一项单中心配对队列报告。
Front Surg. 2023 Apr 12;10:1166084. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1166084. eCollection 2023.
4
Does the New FIGO 2018 Staging System Allow Better Prognostic Differentiation in Early Stage Cervical Cancer? A Dutch Nationwide Cohort Study.2018年国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)新分期系统能否更好地区分早期宫颈癌的预后?一项荷兰全国性队列研究。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jun 27;14(13):3140. doi: 10.3390/cancers14133140.
5
Health-related quality of life among cervical cancer survivors at a tertiary hospital in Ghana.加纳一家三级医院宫颈癌幸存者的健康相关生活质量。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 3;17(6):e0268831. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268831. eCollection 2022.
6
Management of Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Literature Review.早期宫颈癌的管理:文献综述
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jan 24;14(3):575. doi: 10.3390/cancers14030575.
7
Adjuvant Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Patients Treated with Chemoradiation Therapy: A Systematic Review on the Pathology-Proven Residual Disease Rate.接受放化疗的宫颈癌患者辅助性子宫切除术:关于病理证实的残留疾病率的系统评价
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Dec 8;13(24):6190. doi: 10.3390/cancers13246190.
8
Survival After Abdominal Q-M Type B versus C2 Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.早期宫颈癌腹式Q-M型B与C2根治性子宫切除术的生存情况
Cancer Manag Res. 2019 Dec 31;11:10909-10919. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S220212. eCollection 2019.
9
Surgical and oncologic outcomes after robotic radical hysterectomy as compared to open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early cervical cancer.与开放性根治性子宫切除术相比,机器人根治性子宫切除术治疗早期宫颈癌后的手术及肿瘤学结局。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Nov;28(6):e82. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e82.
10
Early Cervical Cancer: Current Dilemmas of Staging and Surgery.早期宫颈癌:目前分期与手术的困境
Curr Oncol Rep. 2017 Aug;19(8):51. doi: 10.1007/s11912-017-0614-5.