Cao L, Yoshino T, Nishiuchi R, Yamadori I, Akagi T
Department of Pathology, Okayama University Medical School, Japan.
Immunobiology. 1995 Jun;193(1):1-14. doi: 10.1016/S0171-2985(11)80152-X.
The homotypic cell aggregation of leukocytes is an unique adhesive event which is caused by cellular activation. Anti-CD44 monoclonal antibody (mAb) induces homotypic cell aggregation of hematopoietic cell lines expressing CD44, but the mechanism of homotypic cell aggregation is poorly understood. We used four mAbs against CD44: TL-1 which was newly developed and seemed to react with a non-hyaluronate binding site, OS/37 and BU52 which recognized a hyaluronate binding site, and Hermes-3 which recognized a non-hyaluronate binding site. TL-1 treatment induced strong homotypic cell aggregation in several types of cell lines including a B cell line from a patient with leukocyte adhesion deficiency syndromes (LAD) and normal peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL). OS/37 and BU52 also induced weak homotypic cell aggregation. None of these anti-CD44 mAbs-induced homotypic cell aggregations was blocked by antibodies against LFA-1, ICAM-1, VLA-4, or L-selectin. Interestingly, the TL-1-induced homotypic cell aggregation was blocked by Hermes-3 or OS/37, but not by BU52. BU52-induced homotypic cell aggregation was blocked by Hermes-3 or OS/37, but not by TL-1. OS/37-induced homotypic cell aggregation was blocked by Hermes-3, TL-1 or BU52. The blocking experiments with anti-metabolic agents revealed that the induced homotypic cell aggregation was energy-dependent and associated with intracytoplasmic actin filaments. This homotypic cell aggregation did not require de novo protein synthesis, because it was not affected by pretreatment with either cycloheximide or actinomycin D. FACS analysis revealed that TL-1 binding did not affect the intensity of expression of the CD44 molecule on the cell surface.
白细胞的同型细胞聚集是一种由细胞活化引起的独特黏附事件。抗CD44单克隆抗体(mAb)可诱导表达CD44的造血细胞系发生同型细胞聚集,但对同型细胞聚集的机制了解甚少。我们使用了四种抗CD44的单克隆抗体:新开发的似乎与非透明质酸结合位点反应的TL-1、识别透明质酸结合位点的OS/37和BU52,以及识别非透明质酸结合位点的Hermes-3。TL-1处理在几种细胞系中诱导了强烈的同型细胞聚集,包括一名白细胞黏附缺陷综合征(LAD)患者的B细胞系和正常外周血淋巴细胞(PBL)。OS/37和BU52也诱导了较弱的同型细胞聚集。这些抗CD44单克隆抗体诱导的同型细胞聚集均未被抗LFA-1、ICAM-1、VLA-4或L-选择素的抗体阻断。有趣的是,TL-1诱导的同型细胞聚集被Hermes-3或OS/37阻断,但未被BU52阻断。BU52诱导的同型细胞聚集被Hermes-3或OS/37阻断,但未被TL-1阻断。OS/37诱导的同型细胞聚集被Hermes-3、TL-1或BU52阻断。用抗代谢剂进行的阻断实验表明,诱导的同型细胞聚集是能量依赖的,并且与胞质内肌动蛋白丝有关。这种同型细胞聚集不需要从头合成蛋白质,因为它不受放线菌酮或放线菌素D预处理的影响。流式细胞术分析显示,TL-1结合不影响细胞表面CD44分子的表达强度。