Mamchak A A, Hodgkin P D
Division of Cell Biology, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra.
Immunol Cell Biol. 1995 Jun;73(3):266-71. doi: 10.1038/icb.1995.43.
Early theories of antibody production by B cells achieved considerable success in predicting B cell behaviour with simple deductive models. One such model, the one signal theory, postulated that the antigen receptor on B cells played only a passive non-signalling role in focusing non-specific activating signals to the B cell surface. This prediction is at least partially consistent with recent discoveries concerning the helper signals delivered to B cells by T cells. Here, we re-examine the foundation of this theoretical prediction with the benefit of recent information. The experimental basis for the theory was a study of B cell activation by LPS and, in particular, the interpretation of a bell-shaped dose-response curve. The logic applied is appropriate to explain some, but not all, forms of B cell behaviour because, as is now clear, the role played by the antigen signal varies depending upon the method of activation. This re-examination suggests an alternative interpretation of the LPS-induced bell-shaped curves that incorporates a role for an antigen signal. If correct, the mechanism would ensure that T-independent responses are drawn from low affinity precursors.
早期关于B细胞产生抗体的理论通过简单的演绎模型在预测B细胞行为方面取得了相当大的成功。其中一个模型,即单信号理论,假定B细胞上的抗原受体在将非特异性激活信号集中到B细胞表面时仅起被动的非信号传导作用。这一预测至少部分与最近关于T细胞传递给B细胞的辅助信号的发现一致。在这里,我们借助最近的信息重新审视这一理论预测的基础。该理论的实验基础是一项关于LPS激活B细胞的研究,特别是对钟形剂量反应曲线的解释。所应用的逻辑适用于解释部分而非全部形式的B细胞行为,因为现在很清楚,抗原信号所起的作用取决于激活方法。这种重新审视提出了对LPS诱导的钟形曲线的另一种解释,其中纳入了抗原信号的作用。如果正确,该机制将确保非T细胞依赖性反应来自低亲和力前体。