• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Quality of life assessment among migraine patients treated with sumatriptan.

作者信息

Solomon G D, Skobieranda F G, Genzen J R

机构信息

Cleveland Clinic Headache Center, Department of General Internal Medicine, Cleveland (Ohio) Clinic Foundation 44195, USA.

出版信息

Headache. 1995 Sep;35(8):449-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1995.hed3508449.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1526-4610.1995.hed3508449.x
PMID:7591736
Abstract

PURPOSE

Quality of life evaluations can enhance traditional measures of therapeutic efficacy. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the impact of sumatriptan on the quality of life of patients with migraine headaches.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Migraine patients who were given a prescription for sumatriptan completed an SF-36 questionnaire and a nine-item pain questionnaire. Six to 9 months later, patients were mailed another copy of the SF-36 and the nine-item pain questionnaire. We compared the pretreatment and posttreatment scores for the SF-36 and for each question of the nine-item pain questionnaire.

RESULTS

The pretreatment SF-36 was completed by 255 patients. The pretreatment pain questionnaire was completed by 86 of these patients. Follow-up questionnaires were returned by 147 patients (58%). Three of the eight SF-36 scales: role functioning--physical, bodily pain, and social functioning showed significant (P < 0.05) improvement with treatment. On the nine-item pain-specific questionnaire, three items--pain interference with normal work, ability to walk or move about, and enjoyment of life showed statistically significant (P < 0.05) improvement after sumatriptan treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Sumatriptan caused a significant improvement in the quality of life of patients with very severe migraine. This improvement was measurable by both the general quality of life instrument and the pain-specific questionnaire.

摘要

相似文献

1
Quality of life assessment among migraine patients treated with sumatriptan.
Headache. 1995 Sep;35(8):449-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1995.hed3508449.x.
2
Changes in resource use and outcomes for patients with migraine treated with sumatriptan: a managed care perspective.
Arch Intern Med. 1999 Apr 26;159(8):857-63. doi: 10.1001/archinte.159.8.857.
3
Improvements in health-related quality of life with sumatriptan treatment for migraine.舒马曲坦治疗偏头痛对健康相关生活质量的改善。
J Fam Pract. 1996 Jan;42(1):36-42.
4
Impact of sumatriptan on workplace productivity, nonwork activities, and health-related quality of life among hospital employees with migraine.舒马曲坦对偏头痛医院员工的工作场所生产力、非工作活动及健康相关生活质量的影响
Headache. 1996 Mar;36(3):137-43. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.1996.3603137.x.
5
[Sumatriptan nasal spray 20mg: efficacy, tolerance and quality of life in migraine patients].[20毫克舒马曲坦鼻喷雾剂:偏头痛患者的疗效、耐受性及生活质量]
Rev Neurol (Paris). 2000 Jul;156(6-7):646-53.
6
Evolution of the measurement of quality of life in migraine.偏头痛患者生活质量测量方法的演变
Neurology. 1997 Mar;48(3 Suppl 3):S10-5. doi: 10.1212/wnl.48.3_suppl_3.10s.
7
Using pretreatment quality of life perceptions to predict response to sumatriptan in migraineurs.利用偏头痛患者治疗前的生活质量认知来预测对舒马曲坦的反应。
Headache. 1997 Nov-Dec;37(10):630-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.1997.3710630.x.
8
Sumatriptan/Naproxen sodium for migraine: efficacy, health related quality of life, and satisfaction outcomes.舒马曲坦/萘普生钠治疗偏头痛:疗效、健康相关生活质量及满意度结果
Headache. 2007 May;47(5):683-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2007.00790.x.
9
Subcutaneous sumatriptan for the treatment of migraine: humanistic, economic, and clinical consequences.皮下注射舒马曲坦治疗偏头痛:人文、经济及临床后果
Fam Med. 1996 Mar;28(3):171-7.
10
Effect of preventive treatment on health-related quality of life in episodic migraine.预防性治疗对发作性偏头痛患者健康相关生活质量的影响。
J Headache Pain. 2005 Oct;6(5):387-91. doi: 10.1007/s10194-005-0233-7. Epub 2005 Aug 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Neurological Health: Not Merely the Absence of Disease: Current Wellbeing Instruments Across the Spectrum of Neurology.神经健康:不仅仅是没有疾病——神经病学领域的当前健康状况评估工具
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2022 May 5;17(2):299-316. doi: 10.1177/15598276221086584. eCollection 2023 Mar-Apr.
2
Assessment of Quality of Life in Migraine.偏头痛患者生活质量评估
Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2013 Aug;50(Suppl 1):S60-S64. doi: 10.4274/Npa.y7310. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
3
Comparison of validity and reliability of the Migraine disability assessment (MIDAS) versus headache impact test (HIT) in an Iranian population.
偏头痛残疾评估量表(MIDAS)与头痛影响测试(HIT)在伊朗人群中的效度和信度比较
Iran J Neurol. 2011;10(3-4):39-42.
4
The Development and Psychometric Properties of the MSQOL: A Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Instrument.《MSQOL:偏头痛特异性生活质量量表的制定与心理测量学特性》。
Clin Drug Investig. 1998;15(5):413-23. doi: 10.2165/00044011-199815050-00006.
5
Use of the sustained pain-free plus no adverse events endpoint in clinical trials of triptans in acute migraine.在曲坦类药物治疗急性偏头痛的临床试验中使用持续无痛加无不良事件的终点指标。
CNS Drugs. 2007;21(1):73-82. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200721010-00006.
6
An economic evaluation of rizatriptan in the treatment of migraine.利扎曲普坦治疗偏头痛的经济学评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2005;23(8):837-50. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200523080-00008.
7
Usefulness of the SF-8 Health Survey for comparing the impact of migraine and other conditions.SF-8健康调查在比较偏头痛和其他疾病影响方面的效用。
Qual Life Res. 2003 Dec;12(8):1003-12. doi: 10.1023/a:1026179517081.
8
The responsiveness of headache impact scales scored using 'classical' and 'modern' psychometric methods: a re-analysis of three clinical trials.使用“经典”和“现代”心理测量方法评分的头痛影响量表的反应性:三项临床试验的重新分析
Qual Life Res. 2003 Dec;12(8):903-12. doi: 10.1023/a:1026111029376.
9
Unilateral visual impairment and health related quality of life: the Blue Mountains Eye Study.单眼视力损害与健康相关生活质量:蓝山眼研究
Br J Ophthalmol. 2003 Apr;87(4):392-5. doi: 10.1136/bjo.87.4.392.
10
Prospective study designs in outcomes research: the case of migraine.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2002;20(11):715-25. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200220110-00001.