• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

QSHP提案:最常被问到的10个问题。

The QSHP proposal: 10 questions most often asked.

作者信息

Grace T W, Beckley S L

机构信息

Ohio State University in Columbus, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Health. 1995 Sep;44(2):43-9. doi: 10.1080/07448481.1995.9937510.

DOI:10.1080/07448481.1995.9937510
PMID:7593991
Abstract

Qualified Student Health Plans (QSHPs) have gained increasing support since the authors introduced the proposal to the field of college health in 1994. This article answers 10 of the most frequently asked questions about QSHPs and summarizes changes in the proposal that have resulted from discussions among college health professionals throughout the country. The QSHP proposal, which has been endorsed by the board of directors of the American College Health Association, offers the following benefits for the college health field and for students: It is founded on the traditional prepaid college health model and assures that control remains with higher education; participation is voluntary for employers and for institutions of higher education; no new tax funding is required; QSHPs preclude state interference and provide employers with incentives to contribute to the cost of student healthcare; both the cost of student health insurance and duplication of coverage are reduced and benefits are shifted to where the students live; the problem of uninsured and underinsured students is eliminated at participating institutions. With incremental healthcare reform continuing at the state level, the time to move forward with the proposal is viewed as ideal.

摘要

自作者于1994年向大学健康领域提出该提案以来,合格学生健康计划(QSHPs)得到了越来越多的支持。本文回答了关于QSHPs最常被问到的10个问题,并总结了该提案因全国各地大学健康专业人员的讨论而产生的变化。QSHP提案已得到美国大学健康协会董事会的认可,为大学健康领域和学生提供了以下好处:它基于传统的预付大学健康模式,并确保控制权仍掌握在高等教育机构手中;雇主和高等教育机构可自愿参与;无需新的税收资金;QSHPs可防止国家干预,并为雇主提供激励措施,促使其为学生医疗保健费用做出贡献;学生健康保险成本和保险覆盖范围的重复都有所降低,福利转移到了学生居住的地方;参与该计划的机构消除了未参保和保险不足学生的问题。随着州一级渐进式医疗改革的持续推进,推进该提案的时机被认为是理想的。

相似文献

1
The QSHP proposal: 10 questions most often asked.QSHP提案:最常被问到的10个问题。
J Am Coll Health. 1995 Sep;44(2):43-9. doi: 10.1080/07448481.1995.9937510.
2
Student healthcare delivery and financing programs: adapting to healthcare reform.学生医疗服务与融资项目:适应医疗改革
J Am Coll Health. 1994 Jan;42(4):139-45. doi: 10.1080/07448481.1994.9939661.
3
Healthcare reform: a survey of college health services.医疗保健改革:对大学健康服务的一项调查
J Am Coll Health. 1996 Nov;45(3):106-117. doi: 10.1080/07448481.1996.9936870.
4
At the crossroads: options for financing college health services in the 21st century.十字路口:21世纪高校健康服务的融资选择
J Am Coll Health. 1997 May;45(6):279-88. doi: 10.1080/07448481.1997.9936898.
5
Student health services at four rural colleges: implications for healthcare reform.四所乡村学院的学生健康服务:对医疗改革的启示
J Am Coll Health. 1995 Jul;44(1):15-9. doi: 10.1080/07448481.1995.9937504.
6
National health care reform and a single-payer system: messiah or pariah?国家医疗保健改革与单一支付者制度:救世主还是贱民?
J Health Hum Serv Adm. 1997 Winter;19(3):341-56.
7
Health services at large public institutions: funding, utilization, and staffing.大型公共机构的卫生服务:资金、利用情况及人员配备
J Am Coll Health. 1993 Jul;42(1):3-14. doi: 10.1080/07448481.1993.9940450.
8
Dual choice health insurance policy: a proposal and a cost analysis.双重选择健康保险政策:一项提议及成本分析。
J Health Care Finance. 2009 Winter;36(2):60-70.
9
Physicians' Plan for a healthy Minnesota. The MMA proposal for health care reform. The report of the Minnesota Medical Association Health Care Reform Task Force.明尼苏达州医生的健康计划。明尼苏达医学协会的医疗改革提案。明尼苏达医学协会医疗改革特别工作组的报告。
Minn Med. 2005 Mar;Suppl:13-41.
10
Congress advances on health care reform: one step at a time.
Employee Relat Law J. 1996 Winter;22(3):89-106.