Maia I G, Cruz Filho F E, Fagundes M L, Boghossian S H, Vanheusden L, Sa R M, Alves P A
Hospital Pró-Cardíaco, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Nov 1;26(5):1310-4. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00317-7.
We attempted to establish a relation between the atrial conduction time assessed by the signal-averaged P wave electrocardiogram and episodes of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients with the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.
The incidence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation is higher in patients with the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome than in normal persons. However, the role of intraatrial conduction delay in precipitating the disorganization of atrial rhythm is not completely understood.
The total duration of the signal-averaged P wave and the P wave in standard lead II was evaluated after successful radiofrequency catheter ablation in 28 patients with the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. The data obtained from 17 patients (61%) with a documented history of prior paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (group I) were compared with those obtained from 11 patients (39%) without a history of atrial fibrillation (group 2). Both groups were further compared with a normal control population.
The mean +/- SD signal-averaged P wave duration in group 1 was 141.94 +/- 9.47 ms (range 130.0 to 171.0). Fourteen patients (82%) in this group showed a P wave duration > 135.0 ms. In group 2, the signal-averaged P wave duration was 126.64 +/- 8.72 ms (range 111.0 to 136.0). Only one patient in this group (9%) showed a P wave duration > 135.0 ms (p < 0.000, group 1 vs. group 2). The signal-averaged P wave duration in the control group was 124.46 +/- 4.49 ms (range 115.0 to 129.5; p < 0.000, group 1 vs. the control group; p < 0.454, group 2 vs. the control group). The P wave duration in lead II was 92.06 +/- 8.85 ms in group 1 and 92.27 +/- 7.86 ms in group 2 (p < 0.949). Using a cutoff value of < 135.0 ms for a normal signal-averaged P wave duration, the method had a sensitivity and specificity and positive and negative predictive values of 82%, 91%, 93% and 77%, respectively, for identifying patients with clinical paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
In the current study, the signal-averaged P wave showed a prolonged intraatrial conduction time in patients with the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. These patients can be differentiated from those with the pre-excitation syndrome without clinical atrial fibrillation as well as from normal subjects. The prolonged intraatrial conduction time may serve as an atrial substratum for development and maintenance of the fibrillatory state.
我们试图在预激综合征患者中,建立通过信号平均P波心电图评估的心房传导时间与阵发性心房颤动发作之间的关系。
预激综合征患者阵发性心房颤动的发生率高于正常人。然而,心房内传导延迟在引发心房节律紊乱中的作用尚未完全明确。
对28例预激综合征患者成功进行射频导管消融术后,评估信号平均P波的总时长以及标准导联II中的P波。将17例(61%)有阵发性心房颤动病史记录的患者(第1组)的数据,与11例(39%)无心房颤动病史的患者(第2组)的数据进行比较。两组进一步与正常对照人群进行比较。
第1组信号平均P波时长的均值±标准差为141.94±9.47毫秒(范围130.0至171.0)。该组14例(82%)患者的P波时长>135.0毫秒。第2组中,信号平均P波时长为126.64±8.72毫秒(范围111.0至136.0)。该组仅1例患者(9%)的P波时长>135.0毫秒(第1组与第2组比较,p<0.000)。对照组信号平均P波时长为124.46±4.49毫秒(范围115.0至129.5;第1组与对照组比较,p<0.000;第2组与对照组比较,p<0.454)。第1组导联II中的P波时长为92.06±8.85毫秒,第2组为92.27±7.86毫秒(p<0.949)。对于正常信号平均P波时长采用<135.0毫秒的临界值,该方法在识别临床阵发性心房颤动患者时,敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为82%、91%、93%和77%。
在本研究中, 预激综合征合并阵发性心房颤动患者的信号平均P波显示心房内传导时间延长。这些患者可与无临床心房颤动的预激综合征患者以及正常受试者相鉴别。心房内传导时间延长可能是颤动状态发生和维持的心房基质。