• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主要上肢截肢后的假肢使用情况。

Prosthetic usage in major upper extremity amputations.

作者信息

Wright T W, Hagen A D, Wood M B

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

出版信息

J Hand Surg Am. 1995 Jul;20(4):619-22. doi: 10.1016/S0363-5023(05)80278-3.

DOI:10.1016/S0363-5023(05)80278-3
PMID:7594289
Abstract

Patterns of use of contemporary prostheses by 135 patients with major upper extremity amputations were evaluated by questionnaire. Eighty-four percent of the patients were male and 16% were female. Amputation levels represented were below elbow, 44%; above elbow, 40%; and shoulder disarticulations or forequarter amputations, 16%. The follow-up interval averaged 12 years (range, 1-67 years). One hundred and thirteen patients were fitted with either a myoelectric or body-powered prosthesis. The overall rejection rate was 38%. Thirty-nine of 42 in the below-elbow amputation group used the prosthesis and appeared to benefit the most. Eight of 141 in the wrist disarticulation group used the prosthesis: as did 9 of 21 in the above-elbow amputation group. In contrast, all bilateral amputees used their prostheses. Stiff shoulders and brachial plexus injury were both predictors for poor prosthetic usage.

摘要

通过问卷调查评估了135例主要上肢截肢患者使用当代假肢的情况。患者中84%为男性,16%为女性。截肢水平分布如下:肘以下截肢占44%;肘以上截肢占40%;肩关节离断或上肢部分截肢占16%。随访间隔平均为12年(范围1 - 67年)。113例患者装配了肌电或体控动力假肢。总体拒绝率为38%。肘以下截肢组42例中有39例使用了假肢,似乎受益最大。腕关节离断组141例中有8例使用了假肢;肘以上截肢组21例中有9例使用了假肢。相比之下,所有双侧截肢患者都使用了他们的假肢。肩部僵硬和臂丛神经损伤都是假肢使用不佳的预测因素。

相似文献

1
Prosthetic usage in major upper extremity amputations.主要上肢截肢后的假肢使用情况。
J Hand Surg Am. 1995 Jul;20(4):619-22. doi: 10.1016/S0363-5023(05)80278-3.
2
Evaluation of prosthetic usage in upper limb amputees.上肢截肢者假肢使用情况评估。
Disabil Rehabil. 2004 Jan 7;26(1):60-3. doi: 10.1080/09638280410001645094.
3
Prosthetic rehabilitation of geriatric amputee patients: a follow-up study.老年截肢患者的假肢康复:一项随访研究。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1985 Nov;66(11):742-5.
4
Management of the upper-limb-deficient child with a powered prosthetic device.使用动力假肢装置对上肢缺失儿童的管理。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986 Aug(209):202-5.
5
Body schema and body awareness of amputees.截肢者的身体图式与身体感知
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2008 Sep;32(3):363-82. doi: 10.1080/03093640802024971.
6
Prosthetic rehabilitation in traumatic upper limb amputees (an Indian perspective).创伤性上肢截肢患者的假肢康复(印度视角)
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2003 Sep;123(7):363-6. doi: 10.1007/s00402-003-0546-4. Epub 2003 Jun 25.
7
Functional comparison of upper extremity amputees using myoelectric and conventional prostheses.使用肌电假肢和传统假肢的上肢截肢者的功能比较。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1983 Jun;64(6):243-8.
8
Prosthesis rejection in acquired major upper-limb amputees: a population-based survey.后天性上肢截肢者的假体排斥反应:一项基于人群的调查。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2012 Jul;7(4):294-303. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2011.635405. Epub 2011 Nov 23.
9
Composite forearm free fillet flaps to preserve stump length following traumatic amputations of the upper extremity.复合前臂游离肌皮瓣用于上肢创伤性截肢后保留残端长度。
Ann Plast Surg. 2008 Apr;60(4):391-4. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31811ffe82.
10
Prosthetic use in adult upper limb amputees: a comparison of the body powered and electrically powered prostheses.成人上肢截肢者的假肢使用:体动假肢与电动假肢的比较
Prosthet Orthot Int. 1986 Apr;10(1):27-34. doi: 10.3109/03093648609103076.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimal Sites for Upper Extremity Amputation: Comparison Between Surgeons and Prosthetists.上肢截肢的最佳部位:外科医生与假肢矫形师的比较
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Jul 15;12(7):765. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12070765.
2
Outcomes and Preferences for Decision-Making for Upper Limb Prosthetic Care: The Patient Journey: A Scoping Literature Review.上肢假肢护理决策的结果与偏好:患者历程:一项范围界定文献综述
Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2025 Apr 25;7(2):100460. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100460. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Prosthesis usability experience is associated with extent of upper limb prosthesis adoption: A Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) analysis.
假体可用性体验与上肢假肢的使用程度有关:结构方程建模(SEM)分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 25;19(6):e0299155. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299155. eCollection 2024.
4
Creation of a biological sensorimotor interface for bionic reconstruction.创建用于仿生重建的生物感觉运动接口。
Nat Commun. 2024 Jun 24;15(1):5337. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-49580-8.
5
Long-term functional and clinical outcome of combined targeted muscle reinnervation and osseointegration for functional bionic reconstruction in transhumeral amputees: a case series.异体肱骨截肢患者功能性仿生重建中联合靶向肌肉神经再支配和骨整合的长期功能和临床结果:病例系列研究。
J Rehabil Med. 2024 May 21;56:jrm34141. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v56.34141.
6
Transhumeral prosthesis use affects upper body kinematics and kinetics.穿臂式假肢的使用会影响上肢的运动学和动力学。
Gait Posture. 2024 Jul;112:59-66. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2024.05.007. Epub 2024 May 11.
7
Extended physiological proprioception is affected by transhumeral Socket-Suspended prosthesis use.经肱骨套接悬吊式假肢使用会影响延伸生理本体感觉。
J Biomech. 2024 Mar;166:112054. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112054. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
8
Combining Surgical Innovations in Amputation Surgery-Robotic Harvest of the Rectus Abdominis Muscle, Transplantation and Targeted Muscle Reinnervation Improves Myocontrol Capability and Pain in a Transradial Amputee.在截肢手术中结合手术创新——通过机器人获取腹直肌、移植和靶向肌肉神经再支配来提高桡动脉截肢者的肌控制能力和减轻疼痛。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Dec 7;59(12):2134. doi: 10.3390/medicina59122134.
9
Testing Precision and Accuracy of an Upper Extremity Proprioceptive Targeting Task Assessment.上肢本体感觉靶向任务评估的测试精度与准确性
Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2022 May 11;4(3):100202. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2022.100202. eCollection 2022 Sep.
10
Targeted Muscle Reinnervation and the Volar Forearm Filet Flap for Forequarter Amputation: Description of Operative Technique.靶向肌肉再支配与用于上肢截肢的掌侧前臂肌皮瓣:手术技术描述
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2020 Jul 9;2(5):306-311. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2020.06.002. eCollection 2020 Sep.