Schneider M J
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1995 Jul-Aug;18(6):398-406.
This study reviews the clinical distinctions between fibromyalgia (FM) and myofascial pain syndrome (MPS), which represent two separate and distinct soft-tissue syndromes. The major aim of this article is to clarify the terminology associated with these syndromes and clearly define the parameters of differential diagnosis and treatment.
Pertinent articles in the chiropractic and medical literature are reviewed with an emphasis on the literature published from 1985-1994.
Studies were selected that emphasized differential diagnosis of FM and MPS, as well as individual articles on either FM or MPS.
The literature on fibromyalgia and myofascial pain syndromes has grown considerably since 1985. It is now clear that there are several important differences between FM and MPS. The most important criteria for differential diagnosis are the presence of tender points (TePs) and widespread, nonspecific, soft tissue pain in FM, compared with regional and characteristic referred pain patterns with discrete muscular trigger points (TrPs) and taut bands of skeletal muscle in MPS. The etiology of TePs is still unknown and it is uncertain which specific soft tissues are tender in FM patients. Myofascial TrPs are found within a taut band of skeletal muscle and have a characteristic "nodular" texture upon palpation. TrPs are thought to develop after trauma, overuse or prolonged spasm of muscles. Local treatment applied to TePs is ineffective, yet specific treatment of TrPs is often dramatically effective.
FM and MPS are two different clinical conditions that require different treatment plans. FM is a systemic disease process, apparently caused by dysfunction of the limbic system and/or neuroendocrine axis. It often requires a multidisciplinary treatment approach including psychotherapy, low dose antidepressant medication and a moderate exercise program. MPS is a condition that arises from the referred pain and muscle dysfunction caused by TrPs, which often respond to manual treatment methods such as ischemic compression and various specific stretching techniques. Both of these conditions are seen routinely in chiropractic offices; therefore, it is important for field practitioners to understand these distinctions.
本研究回顾纤维肌痛(FM)和肌筋膜疼痛综合征(MPS)之间的临床差异,这两种综合征代表两种不同的软组织综合征。本文的主要目的是阐明与这些综合征相关的术语,并明确界定鉴别诊断和治疗的参数。
回顾了整脊医学和医学文献中的相关文章,重点是1985年至1994年发表的文献。
选择强调FM和MPS鉴别诊断的研究,以及关于FM或MPS的个别文章。
自1985年以来,关于纤维肌痛和肌筋膜疼痛综合征的文献有了显著增长。现在很清楚,FM和MPS之间存在几个重要差异。鉴别诊断的最重要标准是FM中存在压痛点(TeP)以及广泛的、非特异性的软组织疼痛,而MPS则有区域性和特征性的牵涉痛模式,伴有离散的肌肉触发点(TrP)和骨骼肌的紧张带。TeP的病因仍然未知,FM患者中哪些特定软组织压痛也不确定。肌筋膜TrP位于骨骼肌的紧张带内,触诊时有特征性的“结节状”质地。TrP被认为是在创伤、过度使用或肌肉长期痉挛后形成的。对TeP进行局部治疗无效,但对TrP的特定治疗通常非常有效。
FM和MPS是两种不同的临床病症,需要不同的治疗方案。FM是一种全身性疾病过程,显然由边缘系统和/或神经内分泌轴功能障碍引起。它通常需要多学科治疗方法,包括心理治疗、低剂量抗抑郁药物和适度的运动计划。MPS是由TrP引起的牵涉痛和肌肉功能障碍导致的病症,通常对诸如缺血性按压和各种特定拉伸技术等手法治疗方法有反应。这两种病症在整脊诊所都很常见;因此,对于该领域的从业者来说,理解这些差异很重要。