• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[如何检测麻风病中的神经病变]

[How to detect neuropathy in leprosy].

作者信息

Grimaud J, Chapuis F, Verchot B, Millan J

机构信息

Institut de Léprologie Appliquée de Dakar, Fondation de l'Ordre Souverain de Malte, Sénégal.

出版信息

Rev Neurol (Paris). 1994 Nov;150(11):785-90.

PMID:7597372
Abstract

In leprosy, the early detection of peripheral nerve damage is essential for the prevention of disability. To date, there is no consensus on what is the best clinical test to reveal such abnormalities. In this prospective study we examined the effectiveness of five clinical tests to assess radial cutaneous nerve (RCN) damage (the most frequently involved). Light touch was assessed by two nylon threads (based on the Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments testing technique) bent on the skin at a pressure of 0.5 (N. 4 nylon) and 0.2 gram (N. 5 nylon). Pinprick and cooling sensations were examined by a needle and a drop of ether. The nerve thickness was assessed by palpation. Sensory findings were then compared to sensory nerve conduction values of the RCN and a sensitivity analysis was performed. The patient group consisted of 108 consecutive new leprosy sufferers (138 RCN) who attended the Institut de Léprologie Appliquée de Dakar during one year. Diagnosis and classification were based on Ridley and Jopling's criteria (clinical examination, skin smears and biopsy). Normal values were determined among 22 healthy subjects (44 RCN). The best tests in term of sensitivity were palpation (.60), N. 5 nylon (.65) and N. 5 + palpation (.79). Their positive predictive values were .84 (palpation), .94 (N. 5 nylon) and .83 (N. 5 + palpation). The best tests in term of area under the curve were palpation (.66), N. 5 nylon (.71) and N. 5 + palpation (.78). The results remain the same for the lepromatous or tuberculoid leprosy patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

在麻风病中,早期发现周围神经损伤对于预防残疾至关重要。迄今为止,对于哪种临床检查是揭示此类异常的最佳方法尚无共识。在这项前瞻性研究中,我们检测了五种临床检查评估桡神经皮支(RCN,最常受累神经)损伤的有效性。轻触觉通过两根尼龙线(基于Semmes-Weinstein单丝测试技术)在皮肤上以0.5克(4号尼龙)和0.2克(5号尼龙)的压力弯曲来评估。针刺觉和冷觉分别通过一根针和一滴乙醚进行检测。通过触诊评估神经粗细。然后将感觉检查结果与RCN的感觉神经传导值进行比较,并进行敏感性分析。患者组由连续108例新诊断的麻风病患者(138条RCN)组成,他们在一年中前往达喀尔应用麻风病研究所就诊。诊断和分类基于Ridley和Jopling标准(临床检查、皮肤涂片和活检)。在22名健康受试者(44条RCN)中确定正常值。就敏感性而言,最佳检查方法是触诊(.60)、5号尼龙线检查(.65)以及5号尼龙线检查 + 触诊(.79)。它们的阳性预测值分别为.84(触诊)、.94(5号尼龙线检查)和.83(5号尼龙线检查 + 触诊)。就曲线下面积而言,最佳检查方法是触诊(.66)、5号尼龙线检查(.71)以及5号尼龙线检查 + 触诊(.78)。对于瘤型或结核样型麻风病患者,结果保持不变。(摘要截选至250词)

相似文献

1
[How to detect neuropathy in leprosy].[如何检测麻风病中的神经病变]
Rev Neurol (Paris). 1994 Nov;150(11):785-90.
2
[Segmental ulnar nerve conduction in Hansen's disease].[麻风病中的节段性尺神经传导]
Rev Neurol (Paris). 1994 Nov;150(11):791-5.
3
The INFIR Cohort Study: investigating prediction, detection and pathogenesis of neuropathy and reactions in leprosy. Methods and baseline results of a cohort of multibacillary leprosy patients in north India.INFIR队列研究:调查麻风病中神经病变及反应的预测、检测和发病机制。印度北部多菌型麻风病患者队列的方法和基线结果。
Lepr Rev. 2005 Mar;76(1):14-34.
4
Comparative study of the cutaneous sensation of leprosy-suspected lesions using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments and quantitative thermal testing.使用Semmes-Weinstein单丝和定量热测试对疑似麻风病病变的皮肤感觉进行比较研究。
Lepr Rev. 2007 Jun;78(2):102-9.
5
Leprosy neuropathy: correlation of clinical and electrophysiological tests.麻风性神经病:临床与电生理检查的相关性
Indian J Lepr. 1996 Jan-Mar;68(1):1-14.
6
The INFIR Cohort Study: assessment of sensory and motor neuropathy in leprosy at baseline.INFIR队列研究:基线时麻风病感觉和运动神经病变的评估
Lepr Rev. 2005 Dec;76(4):277-95.
7
Sensitivity and specificity of nerve palpation, monofilament testing and voluntary muscle testing in detecting peripheral nerve abnormality, using nerve conduction studies as gold standard; a study in 357 patients.以神经传导研究作为金标准,评估神经触诊、单丝测试和随意肌测试在检测周围神经异常方面的敏感性和特异性:一项针对357例患者的研究。
Lepr Rev. 2009 Mar;80(1):34-50.
8
[Detecting and monitoring leprosy neuropathy: which test to chose?].[检测和监测麻风神经病变:选择哪种检测方法?]
Acta Leprol. 1992;8(1):17-22.
9
Histopathological and clinical findings in leprosy patients with chronic neuropathic pain: a study from Hyderabad, India.患有慢性神经性疼痛的麻风病患者的组织病理学和临床研究结果:来自印度海得拉巴的一项研究
Lepr Rev. 2007 Dec;78(4):369-80.
10
Leprosy and the peripheral nervous system: basic and clinical aspects.麻风病与周围神经系统:基础与临床方面
Muscle Nerve. 2004 Oct;30(4):393-409. doi: 10.1002/mus.20113.