Suppr超能文献

[如何检测麻风病中的神经病变]

[How to detect neuropathy in leprosy].

作者信息

Grimaud J, Chapuis F, Verchot B, Millan J

机构信息

Institut de Léprologie Appliquée de Dakar, Fondation de l'Ordre Souverain de Malte, Sénégal.

出版信息

Rev Neurol (Paris). 1994 Nov;150(11):785-90.

PMID:7597372
Abstract

In leprosy, the early detection of peripheral nerve damage is essential for the prevention of disability. To date, there is no consensus on what is the best clinical test to reveal such abnormalities. In this prospective study we examined the effectiveness of five clinical tests to assess radial cutaneous nerve (RCN) damage (the most frequently involved). Light touch was assessed by two nylon threads (based on the Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments testing technique) bent on the skin at a pressure of 0.5 (N. 4 nylon) and 0.2 gram (N. 5 nylon). Pinprick and cooling sensations were examined by a needle and a drop of ether. The nerve thickness was assessed by palpation. Sensory findings were then compared to sensory nerve conduction values of the RCN and a sensitivity analysis was performed. The patient group consisted of 108 consecutive new leprosy sufferers (138 RCN) who attended the Institut de Léprologie Appliquée de Dakar during one year. Diagnosis and classification were based on Ridley and Jopling's criteria (clinical examination, skin smears and biopsy). Normal values were determined among 22 healthy subjects (44 RCN). The best tests in term of sensitivity were palpation (.60), N. 5 nylon (.65) and N. 5 + palpation (.79). Their positive predictive values were .84 (palpation), .94 (N. 5 nylon) and .83 (N. 5 + palpation). The best tests in term of area under the curve were palpation (.66), N. 5 nylon (.71) and N. 5 + palpation (.78). The results remain the same for the lepromatous or tuberculoid leprosy patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

在麻风病中,早期发现周围神经损伤对于预防残疾至关重要。迄今为止,对于哪种临床检查是揭示此类异常的最佳方法尚无共识。在这项前瞻性研究中,我们检测了五种临床检查评估桡神经皮支(RCN,最常受累神经)损伤的有效性。轻触觉通过两根尼龙线(基于Semmes-Weinstein单丝测试技术)在皮肤上以0.5克(4号尼龙)和0.2克(5号尼龙)的压力弯曲来评估。针刺觉和冷觉分别通过一根针和一滴乙醚进行检测。通过触诊评估神经粗细。然后将感觉检查结果与RCN的感觉神经传导值进行比较,并进行敏感性分析。患者组由连续108例新诊断的麻风病患者(138条RCN)组成,他们在一年中前往达喀尔应用麻风病研究所就诊。诊断和分类基于Ridley和Jopling标准(临床检查、皮肤涂片和活检)。在22名健康受试者(44条RCN)中确定正常值。就敏感性而言,最佳检查方法是触诊(.60)、5号尼龙线检查(.65)以及5号尼龙线检查 + 触诊(.79)。它们的阳性预测值分别为.84(触诊)、.94(5号尼龙线检查)和.83(5号尼龙线检查 + 触诊)。就曲线下面积而言,最佳检查方法是触诊(.66)、5号尼龙线检查(.71)以及5号尼龙线检查 + 触诊(.78)。对于瘤型或结核样型麻风病患者,结果保持不变。(摘要截选至250词)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验