Puybasset L, Rouby J J, Mourgeon E, Cluzel P, Souhil Z, Law-Koune J D, Stewart T, Devilliers C, Lu Q, Roche S
Department of Anesthesiology. Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpétrière, University of Paris VI, France.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995 Jul;152(1):318-28. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.152.1.7599840.
The aim of this prospective study was to determine factors influencing effects of inhaled nitric oxide (NO) on the pulmonary circulation and on gas exchange in critically ill patients with acute lung injury. Twenty-one hypoxemic patients with acute respiratory failure (PaO2 = 127 +/- 69 mm Hg during intermittent positive pressure ventilation, FiO2 = 1), were mechanically ventilated with 2 ppm NO and pure oxygen. The effect of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on alveolar recruitment was assessed on an anatomic basis using a high-resolution and spiral thoracic computed tomographic (CT) scan. Four conditions were studied in random order: zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP), ZEEP + 2 ppm NO, 10 cm H2O PEEP, 10 cm H2O PEEP + 2 ppm NO. During ZEEP and PEEP, NO significantly decreased pulmonary vascular resistance index (PVRI), mean pulmonary arterial pressure (MPAP), true pulmonary shunt (Qs/QT), and alveolar dead space (VDA/VT) and significantly increased PaO2 (p < 0.01). During ZEEP, NO-induced decreases in PVRI (delta PVRI) and MPAP (delta MPAP) were significantly correlated to baseline PVRI and MPAP (delta PVRI = -0.5 PVRI + 125, r = 0.97, p < 0.01 and delta MPAP = -0.28 MPAP + 4.8, r = 0.69, p < 0.05). These changes were not potentiated by PEEP-induced alveolar recruitment. The NO-induced increase in PaO2 (delta PaO2) was not significantly correlated with baseline PaO2 but was correlated with baseline PVRI (delta PaO2 = 0.11 PVRI + 30, r = 0.67, p < 0.05). In patients in whom PEEP was associated with alveolar recruitment, NO increased PaO2 by 66 +/- 24 mm Hg during ZEEP and by 104 +/- 26 mm Hg during PEEP (p < 0.01). In patients in whom PEEP did not induce alveolar recruitment, the NO-induced increase in PaO2 was similar during ZEEP and PEEP conditions (+70 +/- 15 mm Hg versus +76 +/- 12 mm Hg, NS). In patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome, factors determining NO-induced improvement in arterial oxygenation and pulmonary vascular effects are PEEP-induced alveolar recruitment and the baseline level of pulmonary vascular resistance.
这项前瞻性研究的目的是确定影响吸入一氧化氮(NO)对急性肺损伤危重症患者肺循环及气体交换作用的因素。21例急性呼吸衰竭的低氧血症患者(间歇正压通气时PaO2 = 127±69 mmHg,FiO2 = 1),接受2 ppm NO和纯氧机械通气。使用高分辨率螺旋胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)在解剖学基础上评估呼气末正压(PEEP)对肺泡复张的影响。随机顺序研究四种情况:呼气末零压力(ZEEP)、ZEEP + 2 ppm NO、10 cm H2O PEEP、10 cm H2O PEEP + 2 ppm NO。在ZEEP和PEEP期间,NO显著降低肺血管阻力指数(PVRI)、平均肺动脉压(MPAP)、真性肺分流(Qs/QT)和肺泡死腔(VDA/VT),并显著提高PaO2(p < 0.01)。在ZEEP期间,NO引起的PVRI降低(ΔPVRI)和MPAP降低(ΔMPAP)与基线PVRI和MPAP显著相关(ΔPVRI = -0.5 PVRI + 125,r = 0.97,p < 0.01;ΔMPAP = -0.28 MPAP + 4.8,r = 0.69,p < 0.05)。这些变化未因PEEP诱导的肺泡复张而增强。NO引起的PaO2升高(ΔPaO2)与基线PaO2无显著相关性,但与基线PVRI相关(ΔPaO2 = 0.11 PVRI + 30,r = 0.67,p < 0.05)。在PEEP与肺泡复张相关的患者中,NO在ZEEP期间使PaO2升高66±24 mmHg,在PEEP期间使PaO2升高104±26 mmHg(p < 0.01)。在PEEP未诱导肺泡复张的患者中,ZEEP和PEEP条件下NO引起的PaO2升高相似(+70±15 mmHg对+76±12 mmHg,无显著性差异)。在成人呼吸窘迫综合征患者中,决定NO诱导动脉氧合改善和肺血管效应的因素是PEEP诱导的肺泡复张和肺血管阻力的基线水平。