• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院与医生、采购组织(POs)与初级保健机构(PHOs):医疗服务提供者争夺管理式医疗合同控制权的斗争。

Hospitals versus physicians, POs versus PHOs: the providers' struggle for control of managed care contracting.

作者信息

Unland J

机构信息

Health Capital Group, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

J Health Care Finance. 1995 Spring;21(3):17-36.

PMID:7600235
Abstract

The great majority of U.S. hospitals are at one stage or another of physician-hospital organization (PHO) formation, in an attempt to accomplish hospital-physician integration. Since early 1994, however, significant numbers of physicians have begun to form their own organizations and confederations. The physician organization (PO), a more highly evolved form of the independent practice association, usually covers a wide geographic area, and it can cross hospital boundaries. Founders of the PO nearly always wish to position the organization to negotiate "master contracts" directly with payers and employers, rendering hospitals mere subcontractors. This article examines the evolution of physician attitudes about PHOs and POs, and also gives insight into the details of PO formation. The author outlines barriers to PO formation, and draws a picture of a momentous industrywide struggle for control between physicians and hospitals.

摘要

绝大多数美国医院正处于医师-医院组织(PHO)形成的某个阶段,试图实现医院与医师的整合。然而,自1994年初以来,大量医师开始组建自己的组织和联盟。医师组织(PO)是独立执业协会的一种更高级形式,通常覆盖广泛的地理区域,并且可以跨越医院界限。PO的创建者几乎总是希望将该组织定位为直接与付款人和雇主谈判“主合同”,使医院仅仅成为分包商。本文考察了医师对PHO和PO态度的演变,同时深入探讨了PO形成的细节。作者概述了PO形成的障碍,并描绘了医师与医院之间在全行业范围内争夺控制权的重大斗争局面。

相似文献

1
Hospitals versus physicians, POs versus PHOs: the providers' struggle for control of managed care contracting.医院与医生、采购组织(POs)与初级保健机构(PHOs):医疗服务提供者争夺管理式医疗合同控制权的斗争。
J Health Care Finance. 1995 Spring;21(3):17-36.
2
Who will dominate HMO master contracting?
J Health Care Finance. 1995 Spring;21(3):1-5.
3
Provider integration: PO (physician organization) versus PHO (physician hospital organization).
Healthc Financ Manage. 1995 Jun;49(6):22, 24.
4
Hospital-physician integration models: an alternative to joint ventures.医院与医生整合模式:合资企业的替代方案。
Health Care Law Mon. 2007 Jun:3-8.
5
Degree of integration can influence organizational economic decisions.
Healthc Financ Manage. 1997 Aug;51(8):46-7.
6
They may want to take charge, but can physicians really organize?
J Health Care Finance. 1995 Spring;21(3):6-8.
7
Integrated systems: subspecialists as capitated primary care physicians?综合系统:作为按人头付费的初级保健医生的专科医生?
Health Care Strateg Manage. 1993 Sep;11(9):12-5.
8
Direct contracting with employers doesn't need to be complicated.与雇主直接签约并不需要很复杂。
Mod Healthc. 1992 Nov 30;22(48):42.
9
Distributing full-risk capitation revenues among providers.在提供者之间分配全额风险人头费收入。
Med Interface. 1995 Nov;8(11):132-40, 142.
10
PHOs (physician hospital organization) boast more cost-effective delivery of services.医师医院组织(PHOs)宣称能更具成本效益地提供服务。
Comput Healthc. 1993 Apr;14(4):27, 30.