• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗界全面参与管理式医疗的法律障碍。

Legal obstacles to medical communities' full participation in managed care.

作者信息

Hilgers D W

机构信息

Hilgers & Watkins, P.C., Austin, Texas, USA.

出版信息

J Health Care Finance. 1995 Spring;21(3):9-16.

PMID:7600242
Abstract

Strong physician-driven delivery systems are vital to the creation of a quality medical system for the United States. To compete with employers, insurers, hospitals, and the government, physicians must consolidate. Physicians do not generally have the necessary capital, management skills, or desire to manage large organizations, however. In addition, antitrust restrictions, antireferral statutes, insurance regulation, and malpractice liability risks are major legal obstacles that restrain physicians from consolidating. The government needs to recognize the problems that federal and state laws have created for the development of physician-driven delivery systems. The benefit to the medical system by relaxing these laws will outweigh any potential risk of loss to the public.

摘要

强大的医生主导的医疗服务体系对于美国创建高质量医疗体系至关重要。为了与雇主、保险公司、医院和政府竞争,医生必须进行整合。然而,医生通常没有必要的资金、管理技能或管理大型组织的意愿。此外,反垄断限制、反转诊法规、保险监管和医疗事故责任风险是限制医生整合的主要法律障碍。政府需要认识到联邦和州法律给医生主导的医疗服务体系发展带来的问题。放宽这些法律对医疗体系的益处将超过给公众带来的任何潜在损失风险。

相似文献

1
Legal obstacles to medical communities' full participation in managed care.医疗界全面参与管理式医疗的法律障碍。
J Health Care Finance. 1995 Spring;21(3):9-16.
2
The legal framework for effective competition.有效竞争的法律框架。
Baxter Health Policy Rev. 1996;2:235-65.
3
Physician negotiations with managed care plans: an antitrust primer.医生与管理式医疗计划的谈判:反垄断入门指南。
Med Staff Couns. 1993 Summer;7(3):57-66.
4
Care planning in integrated delivery systems: pitfalls for the unwary.
Continuum. 1995 May-Jun;15(3):15-9.
5
Integrated delivery systems: reforming the conflicts among federal referral, tax exemption, and antitrust laws.综合医疗服务体系:改革联邦转诊、免税和反垄断法之间的冲突。
Health Matrix Clevel. 1995 Winter;5(1):181-248.
6
New antitrust rules ease restrictions on physician networks.新的反垄断规则放宽了对医生网络的限制。
J Med Assoc Ga. 1996 Nov;85(4):257-9.
7
Legal issues affecting IPA formation.影响独立执业协会形成的法律问题。
Healthc Financ Manage. 1995 Nov;49(11):24-6, 28.
8
Employer liability in the managed care setting.
Empl Benefits J. 1993 Jun;18(2):19-29, 45.
9
Physician-operated networks and the new antitrust guidelines.医生运营的网络与新的反垄断指南。
N Engl J Med. 1997 Jan 30;336(5):386-91. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199701303360522.
10
Legal implications of managed care arrangements.管理式医疗安排的法律影响。
Physician Exec. 1994 Sep;20(9):22-6.