Min Y G, Jang Y J
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Korea.
Laryngoscope. 1995 Jul;105(7 Pt 1):757-9. doi: 10.1288/00005537-199507000-00014.
The authors aimed to evaluate the validity and characteristics of acoustic rhinometic tests by comparing the results with those of computed tomography (CT) of the nasal cavity. Cross-sectional areas along the nasal cavity were measured by acoustic rhinometry (AR) and CT of the nasal cavity in 30 normal subjects. Cross-sectional areas measured by each technique showed a statistically significant correlation. The two measurements showed a better linear correlation in the anterior part of the nasal cavity up to 24 mm from the nostril than in the posterior part of the nasal cavity beyond that point. Mean cross-sectional areas measured by AR were constantly less than those measured by CT of the nasal cavity up to 33 mm from the nostril, whereas areas measured by AR were greater than those measured by CT scans beyond that point.
作者旨在通过将声学鼻测量法的结果与鼻腔计算机断层扫描(CT)的结果进行比较,来评估声学鼻测量测试的有效性和特征。对30名正常受试者进行了鼻腔声学鼻测量法(AR)和CT检查,测量了鼻腔沿程的横截面积。两种技术测量的横截面积显示出统计学上的显著相关性。在鼻腔前部距鼻孔24毫米以内,两种测量方法的线性相关性优于该点之后的鼻腔后部。在距鼻孔33毫米以内,AR测量的平均横截面积始终小于鼻腔CT测量的横截面积,而在该点之后,AR测量的面积大于CT扫描测量的面积。