Hallock G G
Division of Plastic Surgery, Lehigh Valley Hospital, Allentown, Pa., USA.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995 Jul;96(1):153-7. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199507000-00023.
Despite adherence to a rigorous methodology with precise preexpansion calculations that culminate in the selection of an appropriate implant, the predicted surface area gain after completion of tissue expansion often falls short of the clinical requirements. Rather than then resorting to serial expansions, cutaneous overexpansion usually can be achieved to reach the desired dimensions by overinflation of the implant even well beyond the vendor's stated maximum volume. Over the past decade in a series of 69 patients using 97 tissue expanders, some degree of overexpansion was utilized in 53 implants (54.6 percent). No adverse sequelae due to mechanical failure specifically attributable to this hyperinflation occurred. Complications in the overinflation group (18.9 percent) actually were significantly fewer than those observed in the underexpanded (41.9 percent) (p < 0.03) but were similar in classification. Rather than any inherent superiority in the former group, this observation probably more accurately reflects the fact that overexpansion rarely could be done practically after a significant complication. In any event, the proven safety of limited clinical overexpansion allows a margin of error in the initial choice of implant volume and later permits continued expansion if more tissue than originally anticipated is needed.
尽管遵循了严格的方法,进行了精确的预扩张计算,并最终选择了合适的植入物,但组织扩张完成后预测的表面积增加往往达不到临床要求。与其进行连续扩张,通常可以通过过度充盈植入物,甚至超过供应商规定的最大体积,来实现皮肤过度扩张,以达到所需尺寸。在过去十年中,对69例使用97个组织扩张器的患者进行的一系列研究中,53个植入物(54.6%)使用了一定程度的过度扩张。未发生因这种过度充盈导致的机械故障引起的不良后遗症。过度充盈组的并发症(18.9%)实际上明显少于扩张不足组(41.9%)(p<0.03),但分类相似。这一观察结果并非表明前一组有任何内在优势,而可能更准确地反映了一个事实,即重大并发症后实际上很少能进行过度扩张。无论如何,有限的临床过度扩张已被证明是安全的,这在最初选择植入物体积时允许有一定的误差范围,如果需要比最初预期更多的组织,后期还可以继续扩张。