Suppr超能文献

大小便失禁患者的测压评估

Manometric evaluation of incontinent patients.

作者信息

Penninckx F, Lestàr B, Kerremans R

机构信息

Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Clinic Gasthuisberg, Leuven.

出版信息

Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 1995 Jan-Feb;58(1):51-9.

PMID:7604669
Abstract

The relationship between symptoms and manometric data was studied in incontinent patients. Conventional anal manometry, the rectal saline infusion test and the balloon-retaining test were performed in 27 control subjects (M:8, F:19; mean age: 47 yr) and in 40 incontinent patients (M:5, F:35; mean age: 49 yr). The correlation coefficient between the clinical degree of continence/incontinence and the maximum anal basal tone, squeeze pressure and the pressure increment during squeeze was -0.74, -0.74 and -0.57, respectively. Discriminatory values of > 40 mmHg for maximum basal pressure and > 92 mmHg for squeeze pressure could identify continent patients with 96%, and incontinent patients with 88% accuracy. The uncontrollable evacuation of a balloon, progressively filled with water at 60 ml/min, before the maximum tolerable sensation level was reached, was related to the degree of clinical incontinence. Also the maximum retained volume and the interval between the first sensation volume and the maximum retained volume ("perceived rectal capacity") were related to the clinical symptoms: r = -0.72 and -0.71, respectively. The balloon-retaining test proved to be superior to the rectal saline infusion test for the determination of the severity of incontinence. The saline infusion test, however, was found to be more adequate to identify minor defects of continence. Thus, the manometric assessment of anorectal continence should consist of routine anal manometry, the rectal saline infusion test and the balloon-retaining test. Some important clinical implications are discussed.

摘要

对大便失禁患者的症状与测压数据之间的关系进行了研究。对27名对照受试者(男性8名,女性19名;平均年龄47岁)和40名大便失禁患者(男性5名,女性35名;平均年龄49岁)进行了传统肛门测压、直肠盐水灌注试验和气囊保留试验。大便控制/失禁的临床程度与最大肛门基础张力、挤压压力以及挤压时的压力增量之间的相关系数分别为-0.74、-0.74和-0.57。最大基础压力>40 mmHg和挤压压力>92 mmHg的判别值能够以96%的准确率识别大便控制正常的患者,以88%的准确率识别大便失禁患者。在达到最大耐受感觉水平之前,以60 ml/min的速度逐渐向气囊内注水时出现的无法控制的排空与临床失禁程度相关。此外,最大保留容量以及首次有感觉的容量与最大保留容量之间的间隔(“感知直肠容量”)也与临床症状相关:相关系数分别为-0.72和-0.71。对于确定失禁的严重程度,气囊保留试验被证明优于直肠盐水灌注试验。然而,发现盐水灌注试验更适合识别轻微的大便控制缺陷。因此,肛门直肠控便的测压评估应包括常规肛门测压、直肠盐水灌注试验和气囊保留试验。文中讨论了一些重要的临床意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验